Transfer Window Speculation

[honourablegeorge]

1 minute ago, psl said:

Starting to think it'll just be Barcola.

No value, right player, etc

 

[Dan]

2 minutes ago, psl said:

Starting to think it'll just be Barcola.

Nah.

Iraola sounds as desperate for a RW as the rest of us.

[psl]

1 minute ago, honourablegeorge said:

No value, right player, etc

 

Assess the market in Jan

Just now, Dan said:

Nah.

Iraola sounds as desperate for a RW as the rest of us.

I'm sure he is.

[Tommok]

2 minutes ago, Dan said:

Nah.

Iraola sounds as desperate for a RW as the rest of us.

I don't think Hughes or FSG are bothered too much about what the manager wants really. 

[Hus]

8 minutes ago, Dan said:

Nah.

Iraola sounds as desperate for a RW as the rest of us.

Plus a midfielder and a RB.

Feel like we have been here lots of times...

[Conrad]

1 hour ago, Maldini said:

Sending Elliott out on loan is moronic as well, we're short at 10 and RW, why are we getting rid of another body?

Getting someone off the wages who the manager thinks is not good enough is not moronic

what is moronic is not getting a fee for him last year but even then we struggled to get takers

There isn’t a premier league club prepared to buy him even for 10-15 million.

That’s the reality. 

[Martinus]

So we were/are prepared to spend more on Sarr than Mbaye. 

[McBain]

13 minutes ago, Martinus said:

So we were/are prepared to spend more on Sarr than Mbaye. 

I'm fine with the idea that we establish a value on players and if another club are willing to overpay, then so be it. Mbaye might be valued by us at £30m but is going for £50m. Long as we actually get the guy we choose, it's all good. Big f***ing leap of faith needed though that we do

I'm appreciative though as it means we're in for a helluva few days. More exciting than most telly 

 

Edited 52 minutes ago by McBain

[D.Boon]

2 hours ago, bsl said:

He's 18, and I wonder how many of you have seen him? I haven't so I'm not arsed at all.

The way I look at it if he's any good we can buy him off Villa in a couple of seasons for £150 million.

GET IN!

[psl]

40 minutes ago, McBain said:

I'm fine with the idea that we establish a value on players and if another club are willing to overpay, then so be it. Mbaye might be valued by us at £30m but is going for £50m. Long as we actually get the guy we choose, it's all good. Big f***ing leap of faith needed though that we do

I'm appreciative though as it means we're in for a helluva few days. More exciting than most telly 

 

Hopefully we are.

Or maybe we get 'Liverpool do not expect to add further to their squad, instead allowing Iraola to see how the current squad adapt to his methods before assessing the market and Minteh's recovery from injury in January' after Barcola.

[Greenoak]

54 minutes ago, Conrad said:

Getting someone off the wages who the manager thinks is not good enough is not moronic

what is moronic is not getting a fee for him last year but even then we struggled to get takers

There isn’t a premier league club prepared to buy him even for 10-15 million.

That’s the reality. 

Harvey is Championship level, and none of those wanted him either.. Lazy slow and unfit.. not a good look.

 

[Foxtrot]

2 hours ago, Dan said:

18 yr old troublemaker with a gobschite of a ma. No fkin thanks. Villa are welcome to him.

This “tough mama” stuff comes from one (1) article. It’s the same as with Mbappe’s and Rabiot’s mums. Mums in football business = bad. Somehow all the chicanery that goes on everyday in football and any other business conducted by males is the expected normal outcome, but when a “mum” enters the picture, it gets loads of bad press. Mbaye is with Jorge Mendes now, and he’s a the most exploitative  a****** in the business. 

[RBM]

1 hour ago, psl said:

Starting to think it'll just be Barcola.

Yep, or at the very best a stop gap. We wouldn’t be scrambling around the way we are if we had a plan. Shouldn’t have been in such a rush to get Salah out. 

[psl]

𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢 - @FabrizioRomano regarding Liverpool’s stance on Mbaye: “Liverpool were very clear that they didn’t want to spend crazy money on two players from the same club. Bringing the price down for both players [Mbaye & Barcola] was going to be difficult.”

Idiotic if this is really a consideration. Surely you price each player based on value, not on the fact two targets play for the same club.

Edited 11 minutes ago by psl

[RBM]

1 hour ago, honourablegeorge said:

No value, right player, etc

 

Yep, usual line. History repeating 

1 hour ago, Dan said:

Nah.

Iraola sounds as desperate for a RW as the rest of us.

And klopp was desperate for centre halves. 

1 hour ago, Conrad said:

Getting someone off the wages who the manager thinks is not good enough is not moronic

what is moronic is not getting a fee for him last year but even then we struggled to get takers

There isn’t a premier league club prepared to buy him even for 10-15 million.

That’s the reality. 

Why does it matter if we’re buying from one or two clubs? Usual illogical logic from our t*** in suits 

[stacka]

6 minutes ago, psl said:

𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢 - @FabrizioRomano regarding Liverpool’s stance on Mbaye: “Liverpool were very clear that they didn’t want to spend crazy money on two players from the same club. Bringing the price down for both players [Mbaye & Barcola] was going to be difficult.”

Idiotic if this is really a consideration. Surely you price each player based on value, not on the fact two targets play for the same club.

Sounds like a poor excuse what does it matter if they are both from the same club in if it's the players your after

[Dan]

11 minutes ago, Foxtrot said:

This “tough mama” stuff comes from one (1) article. It’s the same as with Mbappe’s and Rabiot’s mums. Mums in football business = bad. Somehow all the chicanery that goes on everyday in football and any other business conducted by males is the expected normal outcome, but when a “mum” enters the picture, it gets loads of bad press. Mbaye is with Jorge Mendes now, and he’s a the most exploitative  a****** in the business. 

I was being slightly facetious.