surf Posted 34 minutes ago Posted 34 minutes ago 35 minutes ago, Molby said: well this might sound a bit unreasonable and irrational but: on second thoughts actually I’m not sure soz for wasting your time that's really all we're here for, he should be thanking you 13 minutes ago, Maldini said: They have over the last few years since it's actually being enforced, it's definitely had an impact on their spending how on earth have chelsea been able to spend >1 billion in 3 years time?
WillG Posted 32 minutes ago Posted 32 minutes ago 50 minutes ago, Maldini said: City spent an absolute fortune in January, would they have the room in PSR to sign Wirtz for £125m? They've a lot of work to do elsewhere as well You're forgetting their new sponsorship money
surf Posted 32 minutes ago Posted 32 minutes ago 5 minutes ago, Gethin said: If they need PSR headroom they'll do "yoof swaps for stupid money" with another club that also need it (a la Villa and Newcastle last summer), invent some more sponsorships or just use the £50-100m they're about to get for this Micky Mouse tournament. i should have read on a bit
Kahnee Posted 31 minutes ago Posted 31 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, surf said: how on earth have chelsea been able to spend >1 billion in 3 years time? Well, they were able to sell their ground to Chelsea, and I think Chelsea bought the hotels off them...
Dan Posted 31 minutes ago Posted 31 minutes ago (edited) I'd be happy with sloppy seconds on Gibbs-White BTW If they go for Wirtz instead. Edited 25 minutes ago by Dan
Gethin Posted 26 minutes ago Posted 26 minutes ago (edited) 5 minutes ago, Kahnee said: Well, they were able to sell their ground to Chelsea, and I think Chelsea bought the hotels off them... As well as that really dodgy s***e Transfermarkt reckons they've also received €700m in sales and loan fees over the last three seasons - also dodgy as f***. City only have €150m-ish over the same period Edited 25 minutes ago by Gethin
surf Posted 15 minutes ago Posted 15 minutes ago 10 minutes ago, Gethin said: As well as that really dodgy s***e Transfermarkt reckons they've also received €700m in sales and loan fees over the last three seasons - also dodgy as f***. City only have €150m-ish over the same period 700m
Martinus Posted 12 minutes ago Posted 12 minutes ago 22 minutes ago, Kahnee said: So he'll engineer leaving on a free in five years? If there is a chance of him signing he is someone who should be offered a 7/8 year contract. Any concerns of who would replace the creativity hole left by Trent going is resolved.
honourablegeorge Posted 9 minutes ago Posted 9 minutes ago 21 minutes ago, Kahnee said: Well, they were able to sell their ground to Chelsea, and I think Chelsea bought the hotels off them... They bought their women 's team from themselves for £200M
Gethin Posted 9 minutes ago Posted 9 minutes ago 4 minutes ago, surf said: 700m https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/fc-chelsea/alletransfers/verein/631 It's been their model for years, stockpile cheap youngsters and sell them off Also doesn't help when stupid f***ers like Arsenal and United pay inflated fees for the likes of Mount and Havertz
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now