Tottenham boss Harry Redknapp threatens media blackout

[Barnesy_10]

Beeb

 

be interesting to see if they punish him for not speaking to the media or whether they squirm around him as they want him to be the next England Manager.

[surf]

slur's been boycotting the media for years so i dont see how they can punish him

[Tosh]

Loves a good boycott, does 'arry

 

Perhaps he should do one final one quoting a few facts....

[Maldini]

Amazing that the media tongue this guy's a*** considering the disdain he treats them with.

[smithdown]

Will he stop talking about other teams players too?

 

Will he a******s.

[Sion]

I wish Roy would threaten not to speak to the media

[Gilps]

Will he stop talking about other teams players too?

 

Will he a******s.

 

It's quite funny imagining him trying to keep not talking to them up. c*** wouldn't last a week until there was something he couldnt resist getting off his chest.

[Rimbeux]

It's quite funny imagining him trying to keep not talking to them up. c*** wouldn't last a week until there was something he couldnt resist getting off his chest.

 

 

So true. Not speaking to no one never no more. Course you wont.

[stressederic]

He'll get right on with this boycott just as soon as he's finished taking the BBC to court for those nasty things they said...

[Stevie H]

It's quite funny imagining him trying to keep not talking to them up. c*** wouldn't last a week until there was something he couldnt resist getting off his chest.

yep. wouldn't be doing interviews but he'd be emailing the f*** out of the journalists.

 

think he does actually have a point about the clattenburg thing though. he's contractually obliged to give his immediate thoughts on a game-changing c**k-up, the ref is not required to explain himself. if it was someone other than redknapp i might have a bit more sympathy though.

[Sir Tokyo Sexwale]

ironic thing is - and I haven't seen the goal yet - loads on here think the ref was correct. Now, if Liverpool fans think a ManU goal is ok, there can't be a whole load wrong with it in principle

[Stevie H]

ironic thing is - and I haven't seen the goal yet - loads on here think the ref was correct. Now, if Liverpool fans think a ManU goal is ok, there can't be a whole load wrong with it in principle

technically the ref was correct yeah, but he ballsed up in not awarding the free-kick against nani for handball though imo. that created the uncertainty which gomes then made a total horsecock of. the subsequent shoving away of spurs players while allowing ferdinand to join the debate with the lino was f***ing amateur hour though.

[Kahnee]

ironic thing is - and I haven't seen the goal yet - loads on here think the ref was correct. Now, if Liverpool fans think a ManU goal is ok, there can't be a whole load wrong with it in principle

 

It was a farce and a fiasco, but at the heart of it were the simples rules - play to the whistle, and if an opposing player is that close just pick up the f***in' ball

[John am Rhein]

Redknapp's rant - clearly falling victim to mind games

 

The pathologically dishonest cockney c*nt

[matty]

When is this tw*t's trial for tax fraud?

[John am Rhein]

When is this tw*t's trial for tax fraud?

 

ASAP

[MarkD]

Some facts;

 

1. Redknapp is a t***of the highest order

 

2. He is best mates with the c*** at Old trafford. Maybe they can carry out their ban together

 

3. At no other ground would the goal (although technically correct) have been given.

[dorgie]

3. At no other ground would the goal (although technically correct) have been given.

 

The 'over the line' goal that wasn't given to spurs a few seasons ago, and then this, it's called 'evening things out Old Trafford style".

 

Clattenberg was the ref on both occassions apparantly.

 

Mike Riley certainly left matters in good hands once he moved on.

[growler]

English fa sanction an English manager from the old brigade? Will never happen. Fungus has been doing what he wants for years. The fa will ignore it and it will all disappear.

[gulaman]

I'm with Harry on this one. Everyone knows the decision to award Nani's goal was scandalous and would never have happened anywhere but Old Trafford. Redknapp called it correctly when interviewed so if the FA punish him for expressing an honest and reasonable opinion then what is the point in talking to the media at all?

[Sir Tokyo Sexwale]

I haven't seen the goal as stated, but how I interpret it - Nani dived & grabbed the ball. Spurs won possession & Gomez had the ball in his hands. As Spurs had the advantage, there was no need to give a FK, so he didn't.

 

I'll have to watch it to see.

 

Maybe the ref should have cottoned on that Spurs were taking the FK & then awarded it to them to make sure the advantage was seen through, but that's a different matter.

[Stevie H]

The 'over the line' goal that wasn't given to spurs a few seasons ago, and then this, it's called 'evening things out Old Trafford style".

 

Clattenberg was the ref on both occassions apparantly.

 

 

wasn't clattenburg lino for the mendes one? could be wrong like.

[domlfc]

wasn't clattenburg lino for the mendes one? could be wrong like.

Yep, he was lino

[Tones]

technically the ref was correct yeah, but he ballsed up in not awarding the free-kick against nani for handball though imo. that created the uncertainty which gomes then made a total horsecock of. the subsequent shoving away of spurs players while allowing ferdinand to join the debate with the lino was f***ing amateur hour though.

 

thought the ref done spurs a favour by not stopping play for a free kick. They were running out of time and needing to score. Gomez had the ball in his hand, i would have said play away too. Did Gomez think it was a free kick? He threw the ball out like 10 yards, like he wasnt aware Nani was still there.

[Bailo]

Surely Clattenburg played an advantage, which when Nani scored, should have been brought back?