Jump to content
By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans.

Liverpool vs Manchester City - Premier League, 10th March @ 3:45pm


ynwa.tv

Recommended Posts

Just now, Tommok said:

Great performance.

We really should've won. 

Diaz was brilliant but really should've scored at least one of those chances. 

Can’t really knock him when he took half the side on again and again.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Barnesy_10 said:

Be nice if Jurgen just gives the refs a s*** load of abuse after the final game 

He's got a load of ammo in his locker 

He gave Oliver loads after the whistle 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ripley said:

Fun ref fact. Michael Oliver has NEVER been sent to the screen. The VAR is always lower down the food chain

Is this a fact? Interesting when you couple it up with Mike Dean admitting looking after his mates when he was doing VAR 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Eiler99 said:

Between this, the spurs game and the Odegaard handball, these refs have had a huge impact on the title race. It’s a scandal. It really is.

Yep. The cumulative effect is absolutely enormous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Swipe said:

Yep dispatch Brighton and hopefully watch them play out a bad tempered draw. 

A bad tempered draw with many injuries and sendings off with both Guadiola and Arteta arrested for scrapping on the pitch with PEDs flying out of pockets and hitting the officials

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Angry Carroll said:

Apparently it was "Unavoidable contact" according to VAR.

 

 

To be fair, that's correct. Once the foot was that high it was unavoidable. Point is IT SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN THAT HIGH TO START WITH.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, smithdown said:

Can’t really knock him when he took half the side on again and again.  

No that's entirely fair - he did everything but score. 

Should've scored tho. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Angry Carroll said:

Apparently it was "Unavoidable contact" according to VAR.

 

 

Yes, because he was f***ing karate kidding him in the chest. 

No anger aimed at you AC. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, smithdown said:

Can’t really knock him when he took half the side on again and again.  

Everytime I would think get him off as he’s gassed, he would run past their whole team again. I’d he could finish like Jota we wouldn’t have been able to afford him so I’ll settle for being proud of him leaving absolutely everything out there.

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hassony said:

Is this a fact? Interesting when you couple it up with Mike Dean admitting looking after his mates when he was doing VAR 

I don't think it's accurate - but I believe he is sent to the screen far far less than any other ref, and it's been ages since he was last sent to the screen. PGMOL just making s*** up as they go along again with this "unavoidable contact". If he doesn't stick his boot far higher than he should, then there's no contact. Wonder how long it will be this time before someone is sent off, booked or concedes a pen from a similar challenge. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tommok said:

No that's entirely fair - he did everything but score. 

Should've scored tho. 

He’s thought he has with that one on one with the new keeper, b*****d didn’t curl enough for him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Swipe said:

I was in the midst of shouting but it sounded like they did what they always do when it suits them. Start talking about how “oooh I think this is a penalty” then immediately say it’s an understandable decision once var cleared it. Might be wrong. I was shouting “c***” over and over. 

They were that f***ing clown on Comms........he's in trouble here.....ref will go to the screen.

No, fair challenge, good decision.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To not give that as a penalty when you see the contortions they do to give one for really really innocuous incidents kinda sums up what these c**** have done to football. 

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hus said:

Yes, because he was f***ing karate kidding him in the chest. 

No anger aimed at you AC. 

Yep. It's an insane excuse to defend a terrible decision. Looks very avoidable to me, don't kick people in the chest. Not hard to avoid. They just make s*** up. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Swipe said:

To not give that as a penalty when you see the contortions they do to give one for really really innocuous incidents kinda sums up what these c**** have done to football. 

It's f***ing nuts. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...