Jump to content
By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans.

Ferguson in naming names shocker


Guest Snorky

Recommended Posts

Parry really should be sending a letter to the FA asking why we seemingly are punished for 'offences' when time and time again United get away with them, it's beyond a joke.

 

 

Apples and oranges. The procedures for players are different to those for managers for a start. Compare managers in the dock with other managers in the dock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He shouldn't be a Sir, he should have it taken away for being an utter c*** of a human being. :angry::angry:

 

Surely it is being such a c*** that makes him so perfect for the 'honour'?

 

And as for all of the 'like all winners he is a bad loser' s***e that some of the Mancs were coming out with in the other thread, do f*** off. Did Paisley, Busby, Shankly, Stein, Dalglish, to name just a few stoop to such levels of slander every time a decision went against them. Is being a c*** in the the Ferguson mode really a pre-requisite of being a 'winner'? Even in the modern game?

 

He's been a fantastically successful manager but as a human being isn't remotely in the same class as those others I've mentioned. Maybe that doesn't really matter, maybe it is just the winningthat matters, but to pretend that his behaviour is no different from anyone else to whom winning has ever mattered is just utter bulls*** of the highest order.

 

Great manager, awful human being. Argue that the latter doesn't matter if you want, but don't try and deny that it isn't the case.

Edited by kop205
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely it is being such a c*** that makes him so perfect for the 'honour'?

 

And as for all of the 'like all winners he is a bad loser' s***e that some of the Mancs were coming out with in the other thread, do f*** off. Did Paisley, Busby, Shankly, Stein, Dalglish, to name just a few stoop to such levels of slander every time a decision went against them. Is being a c*** in the the Ferguson mode really a pre-requisite of being a 'winner'? Even in the modern game?

 

He's been a fantastically successful manager but as a human being isn't remotely in the same class as those others I've mentioned. Maybe that doesn't really matter, maybe it is just the winningthat matters, but to pretend that his behaviour is no different from anyone else to whom winning has ever mattered is just utter bulls*** of the highest order.

 

Great manager, awful human being. Argue that the latter doesn't matter if you want, but don't try and deny that it isn't the case.

 

:applause:

 

And I'm firmly convinced now that the FA were waiting until after yesterday's game before announcing any punishment against him for the Portsmouth ourburst (about 7 weeks ago ffs), in the hope that they would have the title wrapped up and thus ban him for the last two games.

Edited by dorgie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely it is being such a c*** that makes him so perfect for the 'honour'?

 

And as for all of the 'like all winners he is a bad loser' s***e that some of the Mancs were coming out with in the other thread, do f*** off. Did Paisley, Busby, Shankly, Stein, Dalglish, to name just a few stoop to such levels of slander every time a decision went against them. Is being a c*** in the the Ferguson mode really a pre-requisite of being a 'winner'? Even in the modern game?

 

He's been a fantastically successful manager but as a human being isn't remotely in the same class as those others I've mentioned. Maybe that doesn't really matter, maybe it is just the winningthat matters, but to pretend that his behaviour is no different from anyone else to whom winning has ever mattered is just utter bulls*** of the highest order.

 

Great manager, awful human being. Argue that the latter doesn't matter if you want, but don't try and deny that it isn't the case.

I take issue with that - he's been very successful domestically (given his time in the job and the resources available, so he bloody well should be and all), but two trophies in Europe in 22 years (one of which was so long ago it no longer exists anymore) is crap. The 'most successful manager ever' tag is drastically overplayed - pick Paisley's 9 years and any nine years you like from his 22 and he looks very average by comparison.

Edited by fyds
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I take issue with that - he's been very successful domestically (given his time in the job and the resources available, so he bloody well should be and all), but two trophies in Europe in 22 years (one of which was so long ago it no longer exists anymore) is crap. The 'most successful manager ever' tag is drastically overplayed - pick Paisley's 9 years and any nine years you like from his 22 and he looks very average by comparison.

 

He's done a couple of doubles and a treble, Fyds.

 

Then he shat himself, like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest 70400
The referee that awards 3 mins injury time but plays about 2mins 45secs and especially when you are in the opposing half when it only takes a cross to get you a goal !

 

 

Comedy.

 

Slagging Alec Ferguson for having a go at referees, and than having a go yourself at one for shaving off 15 seconds of a game you were losing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...