honourablegeorge Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 From "cricket", dunno if he's the same cricket69 that was on forums years back. I have heard from close sources that there is a 3 day board meeting this week and the outcome could be Parry sacked and a few other shocks, owership and transfers.... lets see the outcome !!!!! hopefully all good news Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Prongsy Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 Parry being sacked would mean that either Moores, Gillett or Gillett jr side with Hicks. That would be a shock because without Parry they will no longer have the majority in the boardroom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gomez Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 Can't see how Parry being sack would be in anyway good news whilst Hicks is still here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
honourablegeorge Posted June 17, 2008 Author Share Posted June 17, 2008 Parry being sacked would mean that either Moores, Gillett or Gillett jr side with Hicks. That would be a shock because without Parry they will no longer have the majority in the boardroom. Yep. Worrysome stuff. Parry needs to stay, if only to oppose G&H. If they manage to sack him, it could mean that Hicks is about to buy out Gillett. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kite Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 It doesn't sound like anything that's really going to happen: the board will sack Parry, basically then sack themselves (change ownership), and finally go off and buy some players. Daft rumour. Unless Hicks is just off trying to rustle up more PR by stirring the anti-Parry pot again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owenthomas Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 agreed.. despite what the majority think of him he is, currently, a necessary evil.. the bad tie, funny haired beaut.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
honourablegeorge Posted June 17, 2008 Author Share Posted June 17, 2008 the board will sack Parry, basically then sack themselves (change ownership) Those two only make sense together if the ownership is to be 100% Hicks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gomez Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 If they manage to sack him, it could mean that Hicks is about to buy out Gillett. Surely it's more likely the Hicks would take over then sack Parry, if Parry thought Hicks was about to take over, then it's possible he would resign, but I would hope he would stick it out until it was inevitable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hassony Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 My guess is that 3 days will come and go and this story turns out to be just another romour Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailo Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 My guess is that 3 days will come and go and this story turns out to be just another romourSource? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBain Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 3 days? Would be more a bored meeting if anything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gomez Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 3 days? Would be more a bored meeting if anything 3 days is probably how long it takes G&H to agree on the agenda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailo Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 3 days? Would be more a bored meeting if anythingOur fax machine is ancient. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hassony Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 Source? Can't say or i will get him in trouble Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailo Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 Can't say or i will get him in troubleAHA! So that narrows the field down 50%...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronnie Whelan Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 The board meeting could be to sanction the spend on david villa..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fyds Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 Doesn't make any sense on the 'good news' front. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fyds Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 The board meeting could be to sanction the spend on david villa.....I've got to go to the nipper's sports day today, and thanks to you I now have to dig out some clean keks again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tosh Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 The board meeting could be to sanction the spend on david villa.....for 3 days? Are they waiting for Spain's next match? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Prongsy Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 Yep. Worrysome stuff. Parry needs to stay, if only to oppose G&H. If they manage to sack him, it could mean that Hicks is about to buy out Gillett. I guess it could (if at all true!) mean a number of things. Gillett could be buying out Hicks. DIC could be coming in. Anything. Or just nothing. Which I where my money is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipnasty Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 I thought Parry was sacked a few weeks ago too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leo No.8 Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 (edited) 3 days? Would be more a bored meeting if anything 2.5 days have been allocated for Parry's bufoonery. 2 hours untangle tie from ring binder 3 hours medical attention for coffee burn 1 hour remove baked bean stain from shirt 4 hours humouring and listening to tales of goalkeeping 'heroics' at 5-a-side 15 minutes every hour wipe down soaked papers caused by joke flower on lapel 6 hours put tiny car back together when it falls apart with him sitting in it, etc. The actual board meeting is only to discuss the menu for the club canteen. Edited June 17, 2008 by Leo No.8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
honourablegeorge Posted June 17, 2008 Author Share Posted June 17, 2008 Or just nothing. Which I where my money is. Well, the most likely outcome is that there's no 3 day board meeting, or a board meeting in 3 days, or anythign in between. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest spk Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 other than a freebie there really hasnt beenany sign of progress in the transfer market at this point. might be that parrys gonna get both barrels for dragging his feet and vanishing on vacation this time. either that or theyre deciding whether to sell torres Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fabfive Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 Not to take this off topic. But isn't there a legal requirement for the board to meet a certain number of times annually? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now