Jump to content
I am no longer developing resources for Invision Community Suite ×
By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans.

Recommended Posts

Posted
OUCH !

 

let's get the bid in for Tevez quick

 

 

...or rip up the 10m cheque for Mascherano and write a new one for 4.5m

Posted
They?d have lost points if they?d been mid-table.

 

Also looks like Tevez is out of contract, can't play for West Ham.

 

Yes Sky say Tevez can not play again for West Ham unless they buy him from MSI for a fee they believe to be £10-£12m and of course they'd need to do that by 12 noon tomorrow for him to play Saturday. It's kind of fooked them as Tevez has been their best player in the last couple of months.

Posted
You've lost me completely here. Why the fine? Is it because of Tevez in any way? WHAT????!!!!

 

For being cockernees.

Posted
You've lost me completely here. Why the fine? Is it because of Tevez in any way? WHAT????!!!!

because under pl rules you can't register a player you don't own or loaned from another club. West ham loaned both tevez and macherano from an offshore holding company (msi). They also hid documents to this effect when registering both players last summer.

Posted

What I don't get is that it was quite obvious that the whole thing was crooked when the deals were going through - how come the Premier League investigate then?

Posted

I'm sure Rafa would've considered a move for Tevez, unless "Tevez is homesick" then I'd say we had the best chance of getting him outside Spain.

Possibilities, too late for CL registration unfortunately.

Posted
I'm sure Rafa would've considered a move for Tevez, unless "Tevez is homesick" then I'd say we had the best chance of getting him outside Spain.

Possibilities, too late for CL registration unfortunately.

I reckon this has the hallmark of a classic Rafa signing.... come up North ya goofy little twonk :thumbs:

Posted

Does this mean Masch is a permanent Liverpool player?

 

If we only had him on loan from the 3rd party we'd surely be under investigation too? I guess we must have spent the cash on him already, rather than having him on loan with an option as has been reported by some quarters.

Posted
Does this mean Masch is a permanent Liverpool player?

 

If we only had him on loan from the 3rd party we'd surely be under investigation too? I guess we must have spent the cash on him already, rather than having him on loan with an option as has been reported by some quarters.

 

 

no

 

he isnt he is on loan

 

thats West Ham,s other option to makeit a loan deal ala Masch

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...