Jump to content
I am no longer developing resources for Invision Community Suite ×
By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans.

Recommended Posts

Posted

They did a Top 10 striker partnerships based upon goals per game and the duo had to have at least 2 seasons together to qualify

 

i thought the results were interesting

 

 

 

10 - Beardsley & Rush - 82 goals in 105 games = 0.78 goals per game

 

9 - Toshack & Keegan - 155 goals in 192 games = 0.81 goals per game

 

8 - Fowler & Owen - 92 goals in 111 games = 0.83 goals per game

 

7 - Dalglish & Johnson - 142 goals in 168 games = 0.85 goals per game

 

6 - Hunt & St John - 341 goals in 384 games = 0.88 goals per game

 

5 - Fowler & Rush - 102 goals in 113 games = 0.90 goals per game

 

4 -Dalglish & Rush - 224 goals in 242 games = 0.93 goals per game

 

3 - Beardsley & Aldridge - 86 goals in 90 games = 0.96 goals per game

 

2 - Fowler & Collymore - 76 goals in 73 games = 1.04 goals per game

 

1 - Gerrard & Torres - 78 goals in 72 games = 1.08 goals per game

 

 

 

have to say I'm staggered by the St John & Hunt stats - and Collymore & Fowler's for that matter but for different reasons !

Posted

Are they the games they started together ?

yes

 

Surprised by the Fowler / Owen partnership as said above.

 

and no Heskey/Owen...

Posted

yes

 

 

 

and no Heskey/Owen...

 

I was thinking that and then decided against posting it. Heskey was prolific in one season but played a fair share of those games with Fowler as well - then he was rank.

Posted

Here's my take on them...

 

Most Well Balanced - Dalglish & Rush (Dalglish's hold-up play, eye for a pass and ability on the ball dovetail brilliantly with Rush's raw pace, attitude and finishing power)

 

Most Exciting - Fowler and Collymore (you never knew what you were going to get but when they were on form they were on fire...perhaps I'm biased as I've seen less of the 60's and 70's partnerships)

 

Most Robust - Toshack & Keegan (those who would run you ragged and batter you senseless and could play a bit too)

Posted

If you combine partnerships it goes like this

 

 

Beardsley (with Aldridge & Rush) = 168 in 195 = 0.86

 

Rush (with Beardsley, Fowler & Dalglish) = 408 in 460 = 0.889

 

Dalglish (with Johnson & Rush) = 366 in 410 =0.893

 

Fowler (with Owen, Rush & Collymore) = 270 in 297 = 0.91

 

 

 

tells me Dalglish & Fowler was the greatest partnership we never had

Posted

If you combine partnerships it goes like this

 

 

Beardsley (with Aldridge & Rush) = 168 in 195 = 0.86

 

Rush (with Beardsley, Fowler & Dalglish) = 408 in 460 = 0.889

 

Dalglish (with Johnson & Rush) = 366 in 410 =0.893

 

Fowler (with Owen, Rush & Collymore) = 270 in 297 = 0.91

 

 

 

tells me Dalglish & Fowler was the greatest partnership we never had

That old chestnut: Dalglish & Rush v Dalglish & Fowler

Posted

They did a Top 10 striker partnerships based upon goals per game and the duo had to have at least 2 seasons together to qualify

 

i thought the results were interesting

 

6 - Hunt & St John - 341 goals in 384 games = 0.88 goals per game

 

have to say I'm staggered by the St John & Hunt stats - and Collymore & Fowler's for that matter but for different reasons !

 

 

I'm staggered that you're staggered and it's an age thing. We won three leagues and an FA Cup in five years with those two and Sir Roger was a veritable goal machine

Posted

I'm staggered that you're staggered and it's an age thing. We won three leagues and an FA Cup in five years with those two and Sir Roger was a veritable goal machine

 

 

well, i grew up watching Dalglish & Johnson/Rush and thought those sort of figures would be untouchable over that sort of period yet Hunt/The Scotsman are only just behind

 

mind you they played in age of 5 upfront, dodgy keepers & it being harder for defenders to pick up attackers cos all the kits were shades of black & white.....

Posted

well, i grew up watching Dalglish & Johnson/Rush and thought those sort of figures would be untouchable over that sort of period yet Hunt/The Scotsman are only just behind

 

mind you they played in age of 5 upfront, dodgy keepers & it being harder for defenders to pick up attackers cos all the kits were shades of black & white.....

 

 

.... and don't forget, they smoked pipes during the game which was obviously bad for a defenders concentration.

 

Roger scored 42 goals the year we came up.

Posted

.... and don't forget, they smoked pipes during the game which was obviously bad for a defenders concentration.

 

Roger scored 42 goals the year we came up.

 

 

but did he track back?

Posted (edited)

The Gerrard/Torres ones - is that with Gerrard starting up front with Torres or just both of them in the team together?

 

If it's the latter, that's even more mighty impressive.

Edited by _00_deathscar
Posted

It's impressive that Rush/Fowler managed to link up so well considering one was 16 and the other was 40. Or thereabouts.

They rocked. There was a R[ush]A[nd]F[owler] vs S[hearer]A[nd]S[utton] spread in some Shoot! annual that I still have at home.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...