Maldini Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 Jesus! Just shows you how far we've fallen behind in that regard. Even Arsenal and Chelsea each earned £40-45m more than us. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/...ced-United.html
tag Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 Jesus! Just shows you how far we've fallen behind in that regard. Even Arsenal and Chelsea each earned £40-45m more than us. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/...ced-United.html sack p*rry??
tag Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 (edited) *double post* Edited February 12, 2009 by tag
Ramón Benítez Hernández Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 Arsenal have a bigger stadium than us, therefore make more money than us every home game just on bums on seats alone.
Maldini Posted February 12, 2009 Author Posted February 12, 2009 I know, we started planning our stadium about a year before them.
Barnesy_10 Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 *double post*worth posting twice though surely?
RP Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 "Liverpool’s need to press ahead with the construction of a new stadium is highlighted by their relatively low matchday revenue figure of £39.2m despite an average crowd at Anfield of 43,500 — 2,100 above Chelsea, who pulled in £35.3m more from home games last season." So Parry should be sacked because he hasn't put our ticket prices up high enough? Or we don't have enough corporates at the game?
Chili Palmer Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 "Liverpool's need to press ahead with the construction of a new stadium is highlighted by their relatively low matchday revenue figure of £39.2m despite an average crowd at Anfield of 43,500 — 2,100 above Chelsea, who pulled in £35.3m more from home games last season." So Parry should be sacked because he hasn't put our ticket prices up high enough? Or we don't have enough corporates at the game? we have 2000 more in attendance and earn 35million less? that can't be right.
Cunny Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 we have 2000 more in attendance and earn 35million less? that can't be right. depends on the relative ticket prices does it not?
bazz Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 we have 2000 more in attendance and earn 35million less? that can't be right.Our ticket prices are lower aren't they?
Chili Palmer Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 depends on the relative ticket prices does it not? But 35 million? that is about £30 more per ticket. I've nevre been to Chelsea but that sounds alot.
Cunny Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 Our cheapest ticket is about £35ish. I'm sure I read that Chelsea's is over £60.
Chili Palmer Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 Our cheapest ticket is about £35ish. I'm sure I read that Chelsea's is over £60. really? f*** me thats tough on the Chelsea supports...
RedMarauder Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 In London, you can charge more and get away with it.The relatively loyal fan base at the likes of Arsenal, Tottenham and even West Ham, mean they would always maintain high attendances, with or without success; whereas Chelsea without success, and their fans will leave in their droves.I still believe they rank behind both Manchester, Liverpool clubs, Newcastle, Sunderland, Arsenal, Villa, Spurs, even Leeds and Sheffield and without the free money propping them up, their fanbase would be amongst the also-rans.
The walters step over Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 we have 2000 more in attendance and earn 35million less? that can't be right. They charge outrageous prices even for normal seats.My uncle used to have a season ticket for Chelsea (supported them since the '60s, blah ,blah), he stopped when they started asking for money up front for the possibility of maybe, if you're lucky, getting tickets for cup games (if you didn't you still never got your money back!). And that was before Roman took over.
RP Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 Chelsea's ticket prices are far higher for regular seats and they also have a massive amount of corporate seats. Anyone tempted to moan about our relative lack of match-day income might want to stop and think for a moment.
Knox_Harrington Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 Chelsea's ticket prices are far higher for regular seats and they also have a massive amount of corporate seats. Anyone tempted to moan about our relative lack of match-day income might want to stop and think for a moment.Back to the discussion about what we want from the football club, what our priorities are.
Tosh Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 Chelsea's ticket prices are far higher for regular seats and they also have a massive amount of corporate seats. Anyone tempted to moan about our relative lack of match-day income might want to stop and think for a moment. But for all the extra cash they spend on a ticket, they do get a little plastic flag! Think about the possibilities, no?
DanielS Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 Back to the discussion about what we want from the football club, what our priorities are. What we want is a reason to moan. Our priorities are that we are at the top in every football related list. We will see no contradiction in this.
Cunny Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 But for all the extra cash they spend on a ticket, they do get a little plastic flag! Think about the possibilities, no? don't forget the popular neck garments
Gunga Din Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 Chelsea's ticket prices are far higher for regular seats and they also have a massive amount of corporate seats. Anyone tempted to moan about our relative lack of match-day income might want to stop and think for a moment. indeed. people moan because we are way behind Chelsea and the MAncs in terms of turnover people moan because we give too many tickets to corporate fans cant really win
Chili Palmer Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 indeed. people moan because we are way behind Chelsea and the MAncs in terms of turnover people moan because we give too many tickets to corporate fans cant really win Increase the price of corporate tickets we currently have by 3000%. sorted.
Gunga Din Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 Increase the price of corporate tickets we currently have by 3000%. sorted. or just get a sugar daddy in and become the thing most of us have despised.
Hassony Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 or just get a sugar daddy in and become the thing most of us have despised. Ann Nicole Smith?
Knox_Harrington Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 or just get a sugar daddy in and become the thing most of us have despised.Or build a time machine and either build the stadium ages ago around 2002, or do it in 2007 rather than sell on the same debt we are now saddled with simply for someone buying it out. We could have been and still could be well run, financially sound and able to compete without a sugar daddy.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now