Davvo

Mostly because he was the central striker I guess ? The formation we've been using seems great at playing through teams, but yes, getting round them and crossing, we seem to be short in the box most times. It'll come I think, with the right personnel.

And is uneasy over putting The Eagles with the E's.

Great player though, I find it easier to tune out their s***e when they were good.

He was crocked though, and not getting a game for them as a consequence, if he'd been in good knick they would have offered him a new deal. We took a punt on him getting fit, and he never did.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

Agreed, I think he should be getting more game time there, would be a good signing if we get him. No idea where BR tends to use him, or in which formation he envisages next season, but he seems to fit the way we want to play.

Yes, if Milner was earmarked for CM, I'd think it was in the Henderson role, not alongside him.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

Aye, we need goals.

Daimler of a player, and improving considerably almost week to week.

Aye, that and the lack of movement in the 2 ahead of him, explained the first half moments I thought. Couple of times in the second half he seemed to get himself into a corner unnecessarily, not his best game, but not the car crash many would have you believe.

The overriding factor for Milner, I suspect, will be what kind of assurances he's given in terms of squad status. He'll only leave City for lifestyle or game time, it's unlikely others will offer more cash.

It needs bursting, only 3 short of Charlton's England record if you read the papers.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

Yes, just what you want off the bench, made a great impact.

Season in a nutshell. Pressure on Sturridge to provide the goals if we want top 4.

He is, and he went on mute after about 20 seconds here.

Makes sense, so we remained virtually static then ?

Yes, he is. The previous year figures were for a 10 month period. So, monthly they equate to £11.9m to 2012, falling to £11M per month in the year to 2013. The next set are due in a few weeks, hard not to believe they should show improvement, given increased revenues over that period (widely publicised). Will be interesting to see if there was any move to pay back some of the FSG loan, as it would take something not previously in the public domain, for the accounts to have taken a dive in the year to 2014. Where Flight should be correct, is that in theory all of the above should ensure a vastly improved set of accounts 13/14 , and even more so 14/15. The way transfers are accounted, the increases in revenue, and the switching of the loans. The next set will be interesting, and hopefully they footnote the 14/15 transfer profit/loss as they have done previously. That will give us a good picture of where we stand now, certainly in FFP terms.

A story about a 31yo man in the Torygraph ? What's the relevance ?

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.