The 'talk' is out of touch with reality in that case. Liverpool offered £4M for Adam and were told put a 1 in front of it last week. Jan 25th 'A bid of £4m is not acceptable. Liverpool should have started with at least four times that offer. Put a one in front of it and it might be realistic.'
But it's not our money, it's Chelsea's! Is Suarez + Carroll better than a disinterested Torres? If the answer to the question is yes then what is there to complain about.
That's sounds like desperation on the part of the LMA - Roy must have told them the good news. Roy will have failed to achieve the median at Liverpool in that regard too.
When is the last time there was a major transfer in January at any club? Arsenal signed Arshavin in January 2009 but apart from that I can't think of one. I wasn't comparing us to the Red Sox, simply stating NESV have money to spend.
They have money there's no doubt about that - 3 weeks ago the Boston Red Sox signed a 29 year old on a 7 year contract worth $142M - $20M a year on one player. The influence of the Wormtongue Purslow is what concerns me, I'd be more confident if we was completely out of the picture.
I have a better idea - from the kick off get Poulsen to kick Cech in the head. He'll get sent off but it'll be to our advantage as we'll have 10 vs 11 instead of 10 vs 12.