Flasher

I think the Tories are confused enough. N-I-N-E-T-Y-T-H-R-E-E

This content is not viewable to guests.

Wimp

To the tune of 5 times. 93 points, we want 93 points this season we want 93 93 points, we want 93 points this season we want 93

That's a given on any weekend 75 to go. Starting with 3 against Citeh.

It's still possible. Believe!

This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.

Hi, my name is Paul. I expressed an opinion about LFC and was shouted at too.

This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.

Gonzalez was awful against Arsenal and was rightly substituted IMO. It should have been done at half time though.

If that was aimed at my initial post, my answer is that I don't believe either Pennant or Gonzalez justify a starting position just yet. Neither have settled. I do think, however, that Pennant was a great signing and will come good. You could argue that Bellamy doesn't deserve a starting place either, but I feel that Bellamy has got the most desire to succeed out of all three of them.

It is indeed a risk, or at least it would be if this were real. I just think he's too quick and too desperate to succeed to be ignored. Fowler. I love him. It takes all i've got not to start with him to be honest.

I would do this. You will disagree, and so might some of the players. Tough. ..............Reina Finnan...Carra....Agger....Riise Bellamy...Gerrard....Alonso...Garcia .........Kuyt.....Crouch Subs. Dudek Hyypia Pennant Zenden Warnock No sub strikers needed as Bellamy and Garcia are on the pitch already and can be moved. I also believe that right now Bellamy would play anywhere. I also like what he's said today about being unselfish and setting up chances for others.

This will be more likely when Agger plays more regular. We're too slow defensively to allow our midfield to play further up the pitch.

This content is not viewable to guests.

Why can't people be sexist if they want to? What difference does it make? He's admitted he is, therefore everyone knows. As a result anybody that disagrees with his views will choose to ignore him in future. Some will choose not to hire him, others will choose not to sponsor him, and so on. So be it. What about those managers and players that say things like "it's man's game"? Are they sexist? Can't wait for the human rights groups to come out defending Newell. This could really get them in a twist. "Our client has a right to express his views in a society that has freedom of speech at its core"..... Personally, I think a female official is likely to be better than most male officials, as she's probably had to work a lot harder to secure her status as a top official. It being a man's game and all. The whole thing is priceless. Looking forward to seeing it unfold.

I read the situation the same as Kev. It was a statement by Rafa to Sami. One that I agreed with too. Sami's lack of pace was at times embarrassing yesterday. Though neither of our back four offer pace to be fair. He was to blame entirely for Toure's goal. Poor pass to start with (one of many yesterday), then left a gap a mile wide for Toure to run through. Still love him. But we need to play further up the pitch, and Sami doesn't fit that equation.

This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.

Yes. We play differently. Teams like Arsenal & Man Utd play the same home or away and we should do likewise. We're more than capable.