Toni Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 He already signed Benjani for 4.1mill and now he managed to coup spurs Sean Davis, Pedro Mendes, andNoe Pamarot for a combined deal of 7.5mill....around 2.5mill each. Some shrewd business by Harry and all his new players will improve his first 11 a lot.
Stevie H Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 think £7.5m for three spurs cast-offs is a bit of a con to be honest. wonder how much of that harry trousered?
cymrococh Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 Pompey fans not happy with Pamarot, he's been there before and was rubbish apparently.
Toni Posted January 12, 2006 Author Posted January 12, 2006 davis and mendes are better than diao and hughes or that french guy they play in the middle...davis at one point before his injury was wanted by many clubs, mendes is a great player for pompey and paramot will improve their back-line as well...for 2.5mill each, i think they are steals. Today with 2.5mill you buy nothing.
CarraLegend Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 He already signed Benjani for 4.1mill and now he managed to coup spurs Sean Davis, Pedro Mendes, andNoe Pamarot for a combined deal of 7.5mill....around 2.5mill each. Some shrewd business by Harry and all his new players will improve his first 11 a lot. 7.5mill good business? He's been mugged bigtime as it stands at the moment ,Sean "I play about two times a year because im always injured" Davis, Noe "I'm absolutely woeful so cant get in the team" Pamarot and Pedro "The only thing ive ever done in my life is a goal that never was, other than that im s***" Mendes.
Owen1978 Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 Cmon harry get pompey up the table and push the blue sh*te down!
floyd Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 (edited) Harry's loving splashing the cash.is the "splashing" a reference to "laundering" Spurs must be laughing their cockerel's off Edited January 12, 2006 by floyd
Greenoak Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 Yet again Spurs get lucky. Not content with getting 8 / 10 mill from chelscum as a bribe for the admin bloke, they now get 7.5 mill for 3 rejects and a ton off the wage bill. Harry is used to dealing with euro cast offs and very low fees, well now we know why. He cannot be trusted to spend wisely. Sorry but 2.5 mill players are usually decent players but this lot are non playing rejects with very little prem experience. Would have been better off plundering the top players from Div one, cos that is where they may be again. Sorry Harry you cocked up. Bet Spurs spend it much more wisely.
growler Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 why couldn't he come to us for Traore, diao, Mellor and others we no longer require? Lucky spurs....
RP Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 (edited) Harry spends £7.5mil of someone else's money and also gets a new indoor swimming pool built in the garden of his Sandbanks home - totally unrelated of course. It's a tough life, Harry. Edited January 12, 2006 by RP
Hassony Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 how ironic that this happened on the same day as newell's comments regarding agents and bungs
Guz Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 Probably not good business in terms of the fee but if Redknapp was given a budget and these 3 were bought in well within that budget then fair play. Just like Chelsea can afford to pay silly fees for the likes of Drogba but if he helps them win the league (or in Pompey's case, keep them up) then it doesn't really matter.
Maldini Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 It's probably bad news for us, less chance of them taking Diao off our hands.
RP Posted January 13, 2006 Posted January 13, 2006 ... but if Redknapp was given a budget ... A thought to strike fear into any rational Football Club 'owner'.
Stevie H Posted January 13, 2006 Posted January 13, 2006 (edited) how ironic that this happened on the same day as newell's comments regarding agents and bungs redknapp was asked about that by the bbc on the radio this morning. he reckons that it's not a problem and that newell is over-estimating the problem. harry added that he doesn't get involved in the negotiating at pompey, he leaves that to his chief executive. who just happens to be peter storrie, ex-west ham chief executive. Edited January 13, 2006 by Stevie H
smicer07 Posted January 13, 2006 Posted January 13, 2006 Don't think they are "crap"... but overpriced certainly. Pamarot is cack, Davis is injury prone, and Mendes is pretty average I'd say.
passater Posted January 14, 2006 Posted January 14, 2006 I wonder if any of the 7.5m is dependent on Pompey staying up?Don't we need Brum to stay up to get the final 500k (at least) of the Heskey fee?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now