drdooom

This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.

Know your football, sonny.

Michael Owen? The welsh turncoat.

1986 FA Cup final had no England players in the starting lineup either. Foreign manager too. Disgrace!

Crouchy should be first choise, he's the best player in the world. John Arne Riise is not.

Neither do I. He clearly felt there was no point working on his right foot with at first 4, then 3, then 2 and now only one year left on his contract and who can blame him.

John Arne Riise - Your Weak (right) Appendage

This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.

I can think of no higher praise to give a player than that.

I doubt anything will ever beat Michael Thomas.

He could have done this with a good old fashioned right footed hoof. If only he had a right hoof to use. These excuses he's come out with does not do much to raise his status in the drcrouchy household. I'm sure this is a major concern to him.

It's a Chelsea song now, I'm sure they'll give him a good reception even if the away fans don't.

My guess is he didn't put it on a plate as much as mess up his ->right footed<- attempt at goal.

It was not a routine one. It never is for him when he has to do anything with his right leg but standing on it. It's the fact that during his years here he hasn't managed/bothered to work on it enough to even perform a hoof with it that's the problem. So he shouldn't have been there, the ball shouldn't have been there, Reina could have tried to cover it blah blah. It doesn't excuse a professional footballer earning thousands of pounds a week not being able to hoof a ball with his right foot.

This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.

Parry might assist in a takeover but he won't be around after it's done. If we can figure that out surely so can Rafa.

Tog not higher than #1 is objective?

You should read the second half, I think that part makes sense.

POOL IN TURMOIL AS PARRY CALLS IN LAWYERS Posted 11/04/08 08:15 All-out war has been declared in the Liverpool boardroom after chief executive Rick Parry rejected the demand of co-owner Tom Hicks that he resign and instead took legal advice over the behaviour of the Texan. Hicks demand was made in a letter sent to Parry, but the chief executive was in London yesterday attending Javier Mascherano's appeal against his two-match suspension and is understood to have first learnt that Hicks wanted him to leave Anfield via Sky Sports News. Although Parry has yet to expand on his short statement published on Thursday afternoon in which he announced his intention not to stand down, it is believed he has taken legal advice after Hicks failed to first discuss his demand at boardroom level. There are also claims in this morning's newspapers that Tom Hicks Jr sent a series of text messages to Liverpool supporters groups, in which, to quote The Guardian, 'Parry's future presence at the club was called into doubt.' It is from those sources that Sky Sports News are thought to have first learnt of Hicks' demand. What a shambles. Although Hicks cited Parry's relationship with Rafa Benitez and his dissatisfaction with the commercial performance of the club, his demand that he leaves the club is believed to be motivated by Parry's perceived bias towards George Gillett junior. In an interview with the BBC two weeks ago, Parry pointedly failed to endorse either co-owner and admitted that "If they're not able to co-exist then there needs to be a solution where one buys and one sells, or both sell." The irony of Hicks' demand is that it is set to be vain because Gillett has shown no desire to oust Parry. 'His resignation would have to be approved by the Liverpool board - a body that comprises Parry, the former chairman David Moores, Hicks, Gillett and their sons, Tom Hicks Jr and Foster Gillett - and Parry believes he has enough support there to fight,' reports The Guardian. An 'Anfield source' told The Times that Hicks had "tried to flex his muscles and ended up showing that he is a lot less powerful at this club than he likes to think." The source went on to describe the atomsphere inside the boardroom "as poisonous." "Hicks cannot stand Gillett. Gillett cannot stand Hicks. Hicks cannot stand Parry. Parry cannot stand Hicks. On the pitch, things are going great, but off the pitch, it's meltdown." Nonetheless, Hicks apparently remains determined to take full control at Anfield, even though Gillett has made clear he would not be willing to sell his 50% stake to his fellow American. In any case, Hicks currently lacks the financial muscle to buy out Gillett's stake and the BBC claims that at least six banks have rejected his request for a loan in the past month. To add to the sense of turmoil, DIC, the Dubai-based group touted as potential saviours of the club, yesterday declared they had decided to "pull out completely" of the bidding process because of the boardroom strife. http://www.football365.com/story/0,17033,8...3409645,00.html

This content is not viewable to guests.

He's the worst, apart from everyone else?