antona Posted May 19, 2009 Posted May 19, 2009 (edited) With a bit of spare time today I decided to look how our record this season in terms of assembled points compare with records of our great teams from the past. And because the amount of league games was different in different times I looked at the correlation of assembled points to points available. And, the stunning fact is, this is at least our third best season in history! And if we 'll beat Spurs on Sunday, we 'll surpass our 87/88 team and only 78/79 team 'll remain better!! Rafa deserves enormous credit for that. But I also thought about how hard it will be for us to improve even further. And how many points will be needed next season to win the league? 90? 95? 100? Edited May 19, 2009 by antona
M4TTA Posted May 19, 2009 Posted May 19, 2009 quite interesting that. How much can you read into the points available then. The teams lower in the league ie competition have worsened since then? games were "tougher"?
fyds Posted May 19, 2009 Posted May 19, 2009 It can - as always with such things - mean whatever you want it to mean up to a point. The nature of the game has changed, the rules the difference in quality between the very top and lower regions. It's a good thing, and can be seen as a positive indicator of the great progress made under Rafa from 'maybe one day' to serious challengers/potential champions...but a large degree of it is still subjective.
sutty Posted May 19, 2009 Posted May 19, 2009 It can - as always with such things - mean whatever you want it to mean up to a point. The nature of the game has changed, the rules the difference in quality between the very top and lower regions. It's a good thing, and can be seen as a positive indicator of the great progress made under Rafa from 'maybe one day' to serious challengers/potential champions...but a large degree of it is still subjective. Some of the levellers have disappeared in making the comparison between the modern day and past football Poor pitch conditions the emergence of undersoil heating as standard It wasn't all that long ago that you were allowed plastic pitches. Plus wealth is more concentrated. It wasn't all that unusual for a promoted team to win the league 1st season up.
fyds Posted May 19, 2009 Posted May 19, 2009 (edited) Some of the levellers have disappeared in making the comparison between the modern day and past football Poor pitch conditions the emergence of undersoil heating as standard It wasn't all that long ago that you were allowed plastic pitches. Plus wealth is more concentrated. It wasn't all that unusual for a promoted team to win the league 1st season up.Exactly right, Sutty - it's not as simple as 'eggs are eggs' anymore. Also, outside of the top four, the calibre of management ranges from reasonable under the circumstances to dire. It's a much more professional, business-like and high-end centric game than it was back then...some of that is good, much of it is not so good. Edit - I should add, this is pretty much the same all over Europe - very few of the bigger leagues throw up any real surprises anymore and the Champions league barring the odd one or two is often no more than a roll call from the year before. Having a genuine four-way tilt at the title when the top four are all firing makes the PL more competitive than most. Edited May 19, 2009 by fyds
_00_deathscar Posted May 19, 2009 Posted May 19, 2009 quite interesting that. How much can you read into the points available then. The teams lower in the league ie competition have worsened since then? games were "tougher"? We took our foot off the pedal once we'd won it?
Rory Fitzgerald Posted May 19, 2009 Posted May 19, 2009 Abort Operation-topple-Shankly-statue, abort abort !!
Crazy Horse Posted May 20, 2009 Posted May 20, 2009 The standard of the league was abysmal this year, that might have something to do with it.
drdooom Posted May 20, 2009 Posted May 20, 2009 As it stands with one game to go the point gap between 1st and 5th is 27 points and the gap betwen 5th and 20th is 29 points. Does that point to the rest of the league just being there to be beaten (or drawn with in our case) by the top teams to a larger degree than in the good old days?
pricey Posted May 21, 2009 Posted May 21, 2009 Hasn't 3 points for a win been a relatively new introduction (80's?) or am I remembering that wrong. Do your calculations take that into account? (not wanting to diminish Rafa's performance this season)
HeWonItFromBrock Posted May 21, 2009 Posted May 21, 2009 We took our foot off the pedal once we'd won it? Absolutely. Take 1987/88. We won the title with 4 games to spare once we reached 84 points and only won one of our last 4 games drawing the other 3 (dropping 6 points). A more meaningful comparison is the number of points required to confirm the champions that season as the games afterwards are completely meaningless once you have the league sewn up.
Jarg Armani Posted May 21, 2009 Posted May 21, 2009 Absolutely. Take 1987/88. We won the title with 4 games to spare once we reached 84 points and only won one of our last 4 games drawing the other 3 And still managed to lose the cup final? For f*cks sake Riise!
Sir Tokyo Sexwale Posted May 21, 2009 Posted May 21, 2009 looking at it - the Champions have had - 87 (this season - 87-89-91-95-90 going back to 04 Mancs won it in 03 with 83 & then it was less stable 02 - 8701 - 8000 - 9199 - 7998 - 7897 - 75 etc
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now