Gethin

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

Shame his best minutes with us are behind him

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

PhilM, 5 posts ago, treated like a dog

Macca's got three years left on his deal I think. Yup. Same as Szobo and Grav. I’d be trying to get all three to sign 2-3 year extensions this season but not worried about Madrid being in for Mac A - they won’t pay what we’d ask I reckon

Yeah you’re right. £30m-ish was Spurs in the EL.

Just UEFA revenue I think

£30-35m is about what Chelsea made from winning the Conference League last year I think

Still true.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

I thought that was great. As Paul said, it's just an excuse for few days on the lash with your mates.

If they've done that, it shows that they rate him pretty highly as their U21s have two games this break and he could have easily played those. Instead they've got him with the seniors.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This looks incredibly harsh https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c20vn0859dwo

The "settlement" sounds very much like City admitting they haven't got a case and the PL promising not to gloat about it. Probably a bit of City agreeing to pay some/all of City's legal costs too https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cy7pk8xyy7go This gives the real reason - basically City want the ability to go ahead with a new Etihad deal https://www.thetimes.com/sport/football/article/premier-league-manchester-city-sponsorship-legal-apt-lj9hdvpld The irony is that the means the Etihad deal will be probably now be allowed as it'll be judged at "fair market value" for a team that's been the most successful English team of the last 15 years. The case to prove that they cheated like f*** to get into that position is still ongoing.

I mean it could just be because they realised they didn't have a legal leg to stand on and not enough support to carry on rabble rousing.

And found a cheque for £50k at the bottom of the glass.

In case you want come background to this Verdict (October 24) https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cq5eyvl7nggo PL change the rules (November 24) https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cj6kg09ee84o Looks like City have got almost nothing they wanted out of a year of legal action

But you can bet your ass City's shills in the media will be