SME

There's nothing committed for phase two and given there's no corporate element to it I can see it failing to meet any "appropiate" cost benefit analysis and being postponed. indefinitely.

I agree but are FSG really doing much better with their plans? The Anfield road extension is still very much up in the air isn't it?

He didn't build anything apart from the Centenary stand, the Kop and the Anfield road?

Infrastructure expenditure is excluded from any FFP calculations isn't it?

Klopp will obviously know him well ..... 2+2 = ?

Worth £644m according to Forbes http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/32617203 Been a good investment so far for FSG then

Another winger? Is he the cheap alternative to Depay?

Do clubs charge the away club up front for all tickets and then make it their responsibility to make sure they sell them all? I thought we do that - or at least used to - in order to encourage other clubs to only commit to the number of tickets that they can be sure of selling to allow us to offer more tickets to home fans.

The impact of last summers transfers are included as post balance sheet events in the accounts - stating a net profit on sales of £52m and a net amount due from transfers of £60.4m.

According to the accounts just released: 27. Post balance sheet events Since the end of the financial period, the Club has contracted for the purchase and sale of various players. The net amount payable resulting from this activity is £60.4m. This activity will be accounted for in the year ending 31 May 2015. The cumulative effect on the profit and loss account since the period end in relation to the profit on sales of players is a £52m profit.

He's only been in the starting 11 in the league since November though and it's a goal every 112 minutes just in the league.

From that article - "The club wants the return on investment as quickly as makes sense. Liverpool has to be sustainable. We have formulated a model that gives a fast return of the capital expenditure over five to six years, but that will also allow the club to enjoy some benefits from the expansion even before that time. Beyond the five or six years, we will of course really see more revenues on the bottom line" So with total cost of £100m and additional revenue per year £20m (£65m p.a. as opposed to £45m), a payback period of 5 years means no additional money to go into the playing side. But FSG will be banking on that their asset is worth a lot more.

That's the point isn't it?

The projections put forward by Financial Fair Play website - http://www.financialfairplay.co.uk/latest-news/will-liverpool-face-any-ffp-punishment- are of a small profit for last season. This current season should also see a profit due to the money from being in the CL group stages.

Work to start on Monday http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-merseyside-30327242

No forward on the bench either

He didn't run past him, he ran from the palace half and Gerrard came forward to meet him at which point he passed the ball. What else could he do in that situation?

He wasn't ... Had to go off to change his shirt

He can be quite bold though

Yes, Neville said they'd spoken with Rodgers in Basle about it

Suarez was confirmed to Barcelona on 11th July - and was known to be happening a while before that - the window closed 1st September - I wouldn't say he went when "the window came close to being closed".

BBC saying we may be investigated.

Well Ayre got his promotion on the back of it so it's bound to be more then £63m ........ Isn't it?!

Lambert? Or was he talking agreed but not signed? Could be Origi?