Snoeker Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 As the new and improved Andy Cole. Needs more than 7 chances per goal. I hope Sven now gets the message and plays the Liverpool (Carra Holding) Midfield. Or some other way that actually utilises their best fit player.
Guz Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 As the new and improved Andy Cole. Needs more than 7 chances per goal. I hope Sven now gets the message and plays the Liverpool (Carra Holding) Midfield. Or some other way that actually utilises their best fit player. Such as...? Carra - central defenderHargreaves - not good enoughPhil Neville - dittoParker - not in squad and injuredKing - sameCarrick - not a holding midfielder I'll be honest, after today's performance I'd definitley look into tweaking the midfield but there isnt a wealth of options availible. And there's no point experimenting during the tournament, might aswell look to beat Sweden and build up some momentum/continuity.
fyds Posted June 16, 2006 Posted June 16, 2006 Got or shot?Got, shot - how can they tell the difference?
sean Posted June 16, 2006 Posted June 16, 2006 You England supporters must be seething. Witht he talent available to you and how this imbecile sets them up, negating the individual threat.I swear I'd be hopping mad were it Eire.
owenthomas Posted June 16, 2006 Posted June 16, 2006 (edited) as long as our lads do well and don't get injured i personally couldn't give a s*** how the World Cup turns out for England.. EDIT: oh and as for Lampard, as i said earlier, without deflections he's a fkin fraud.. the MOTD highlights throughout a season also should show each shot he has apart from the one he scores (deflected) cos if last night was anything to go by then he needs about 12 shots before one goes in (off someone's heel or other).. last night, despite me not really caring about the outcome of the game, he just pissed me off.. like the kid in school who wants all the glory for himself.. prick.. Edited June 16, 2006 by owenthomas
Gilps Posted June 16, 2006 Posted June 16, 2006 And there's no point experimenting during the tournament, might aswell look to beat Sweden and build up some momentum/continuity. Flip side being if Crouch, Gerrard or Lampard pick up a second yellow, you won't exactly have continuty going into the Germany/Ecuador game.
Stevie H Posted June 16, 2006 Posted June 16, 2006 You England supporters must be seething. Witht he talent available to you and how this imbecile sets them up, negating the individual threat.I swear I'd be hopping mad were it Eire. it's insane mate. £5m a year for playing players out of position, unfit or on reputation. a fraud is the manager.
Knox_Harrington Posted June 16, 2006 Posted June 16, 2006 bought to you by the same people that have no idea what role Emerson has performed for Brazil and JuveWhat role has he performed? I must admit to being genuinely mystified by how he gets a game of football.
quibs Posted June 16, 2006 Posted June 16, 2006 Sven is just a bloke from the FA... No idea what he is doing, picks people on his name.. Gerrard should be the one to be the team is built around, but we'll never see it happen. Not bothered about Engalnd, just want Crouchy, Gerrard and Carra to do well and come back fit...
jimmylibel Posted June 16, 2006 Posted June 16, 2006 Whatever happened to the "Allow me to make a case for..." thread titles. Need reviving I say.
sutty Posted June 16, 2006 Posted June 16, 2006 After you've made the case put his clothes in it and tell him to f*** off back to chelsea.
ManxRed Posted June 16, 2006 Posted June 16, 2006 As the new and improved Andy Cole. Things cannot be new AND improved. They can only be one or the other. Yours,A Pendant (Mrs)
_00_deathscar Posted June 16, 2006 Posted June 16, 2006 Yes they can. If it was old and improved - it'd be the original version but improved. New and improved is like an advanced prototype. Yours,A PEDANT, not pendant (Mr. )
Coyler Posted June 16, 2006 Posted June 16, 2006 Yes they can. If it was old and improved - it'd be the original version but improved. New and improved is like an advanced prototype.The ubiquitousness of this handy, everyday phrase completely backing up the distinction you make.
ManxRed Posted June 16, 2006 Posted June 16, 2006 If something is new there was no old version to be improved upon. If something is improved there was obviously a previous version of it and hence it cannot be new. Q.E.D. Mrs Pendant.
ManxRed Posted June 16, 2006 Posted June 16, 2006 Pendant is the new and improved version of the word pedant.
fyds Posted June 16, 2006 Posted June 16, 2006 You England supporters must be seething. Witht he talent available to you and how this imbecile sets them up, negating the individual threat.I swear I'd be hopping mad were it Eire.Eire? You mean England C?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now