Redwire

This content is not viewable to guests.

Is this by the woman who used to be the head of a school?

This content is not viewable to guests.

Is he that ping pong c*nt?

...and the needle. Don't forget the needle.

Enjoyed that.

Holt again tonight: "The idea that Suarez's use of 'negro' was acceptable because he was being conciliatory is, frankly, an insult to the intelligence. Did you watch him in the 25 minutes he spent on the pitch on Monday night? Not strictly relevant, perhaps, but there was not a conciliatory bone in his body." http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/opinion/columnists/oliver-holt/Oliver-Holt-column-Why-Liverpool-Manager-Kenny-Dalglish-s-stance-on-Suarez-is-dangerous-disingenuous-and-irresponsible-article862645.html

They're not really journalists though are they. They are just people who write about football. People who write about model railways, grouse shooting or stamp collecting don't get tagged as journalists, no real reason why blokes writing about the footy deserve the label any more than they do.

This content is not viewable to guests.

If he's found guilty the FA will charge him.

Why don't you just post the link?

What's it say? Won't play on my work laptop for some reason.

In the Independent: "It says something for Liverpool's relative decline that next month's final against Cardiff City will be his (Gerrard's) first taste of Wembley in a Liverpool shirt"

We lost a Fair's Cup semi at Anfield to Leeds in 1971.

Bellamy Kuyt Gerrard

Don't know, haven't got one. Try this: http://premier--streams.eu/

Sopcast Channel - 119538

This content is not viewable to guests.

This is on there now: This e-petition has received the following response: This e-petition has now passed the threshold of 100 000 signatures. The Leader of the House of Commons has written to the Backbench Business Committee, who are responsible for the scheduling of debates on e-petitions, informing them that the petition has reached 100 000 signatures The Backbench Business Committee meets weekly to hear representations from MPs for debates in backbench time. The Committee can consider any subject for debate, including those raised in e-petitions, but an MP must make the case for their consideration. More information about the Committee is available on its website http://www.parliament.uk/bbcom Since the petition was brought to the attention of the Attorney General, he has agreed that he will look at the applications made to his predecessor, to determine whether in his view, the evidence available supports an application to the Court for a new inquest.

This content is not viewable to guests.

Who is the ref?

Are they having a whole show on that one "tackle"?

Exactly. He was so far ahead of the player in winning the ball that Lescott ended up kicking him in the a*se.

You do realise that whether we've handed over the full whack yet is irrelevant don't you? We bought him for £35m, that's what we have to pay. If we sell him for £15m tomorrow the price we bought him for still stands.

Same here, which is why I wouldn't be that surprised if it turned out to be a case of a misheard "manc b*stard".