Gravy

What relevance do you think it has that the club have now fianlly ditched Hawkpoint (who were obviously not doing their job properly) and are now with PWC?

Of course oh Lord and master. you know different. This must be due to the fact that in the last two years people have been banging Rick Parry's door down to invest upwards of 50 million for a minority shareholding. Oh, hang on In the meantime, grounds costs have gone through the roof and we still have no investors. No rush though hey.

I want Lyon to win it for GH's sake but I have no problem with Arsenal winning it if not. Imagine how p***** off Mourinho and Ferguson would be.

Absolutely right. BTW, £20 million would by you two World class players now, just as much as it would then.

Yes, but you knew what I meant. Maybe I should have made my point crystal clear for the hard of understanding. £50 million plus as well as the funds for the stadium. Better?

Looks like we have a new pedant. Will, you have competition.

£20 million is not going to give us what we need to build a stadium and a squad is it?. We're talking about 5-10 times that amount.

Can someone tell me wtf Hawkpoint have been doing to 2 years???? They sure as hell would want majority shareholding. I repeat, no-one is going to plough 10's of millions into the club without majority shareholding.

Leading shareholder and having 51% are different things though aren't they. I just can't imagine that anyone would plough that money into a football club unless they came out with 51%. They would then have to buy some of Moores/other peoples shares as well. I just can't see it happening otherwise Nope, I know about as much as you or most other people do and that is very little. As I said though, no-one will plough that money into a football club without becoming majority shareholder.

So what? Fowler says in his biography that he was more tha n willing to go there.

Do the sunglasses depict the Middle East?

I'm just glad the whole thing hasn't been a long drawn out mess.

This content is not viewable to guests.

My season ticket is for all home games and in the book we haver tickets for all FA/Carling and European games. The less games we have the more it costs. That's the way it is. If I don't like it I can give up the ticket but then of course I don't have a ST.

There won't be enough for all those. There were 36-38K reds at the Man U game alone, plus the ST holders that couildn't make that game and the fans at the other three games.

Now now Kev. I thank all of you who are worried about my allocation but in the ST that we have you are guaranteed a semi final and final ticket regardless, so this argument doesn't apply to me. What I am saying, is that ST holders should get first dibs on semi and final tickets. They stump up a huge wedge of cash in June and one of the pay offs should be a semi and final ticket.

Yes they are. NHE is implying that I shopuldn't be entitled to a semi final ticket. And paid for 4 games.

I purchased my FA Cup tickets last June. Included in my ST was the purchase of 4 home matches in the FA Cup, which determines part of the price of the ST. We only had one (which I went to). WTF shouldn't I be entitled to a semi-final ticket?

I take it you're having a pop at me? By how do you determine unpopular? One that someone can't attend due to family commitments on a Sunday or one that decides it isn't a "big game". Would you consider the Everton game an unpopular game? I fork out about £1600 a year in June. Included in that price are FA Cup home games, so whether I go or not I have already purchased so yes, I think I have a right to a semi-final and final ticket. Included in that price are FA Cup home games, so whether I go or not I have already purchased one.

Disagree. IMO, ST holder who shell out at the befginning of the season shopuld get first shout. That's part of what being a ST holder is about. IMO.

This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.