aka Dus

Dortmund lose again. Bundesliga already over.

This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.

We were all giddy at the prospect of playing CL last March, April, May. It's childish but I feel cheated!

This content is not viewable to guests.

I wasn't criticising, I was complimenting you.

It's the 'easy' fixtures that give me the willies, TBH. Would prefer if we had to go play Man U or Arsenal or someone. I have to believe that Spurs was our real level and various smaller factors just need to be tweaked to get back there.

For someone that appears to have poor grammar and not great (but not that bad) spelling, and whose English is not their mother tongue I would assume, your vocabulary is very impressive.

Walk around Europe with a €50m transfer fee, €250K a week wages and offering CL football and another run at the Premier League and your options increase dramatically.

I think he needed to try replace Suarez with someone the other players would look at coming in and thing "Yes!!" as much as anything else. That's not a 'sign big names' thing exactly, and Mario is not that despite all the excitement at the time, but there needed to be a Suarez from Ajax, Torres from Atletico type signing at the very least. Someone that was widely considered to be a potential superstar, someone to bolster belief and be a good bet for 20 goals a season. He can still do this in January and probably needs to, spending £50m in the process.

This content is not viewable to guests.

Countries scrambling to get out of 2022 Winter Olympics candidacy due to costs and dislike of the IOC's Ts&Cs. Maybe an indication of the way the wind is blowing. http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/wireStory/norway-government-rejects-2022-winter-olympics-25894588 The Olympics that no one seems to want is down to just two candidates. Oslo became the latest city to drop its bid for the 2022 Winter Games after the Norwegian government rejected financial backing for the project on Wednesday amid concerns the games were too costly — a decision the IOC said was based on "half-truths and factual inaccuracies." Oslo's exit leaves Beijing and Almaty, Kazakhstan, as the only two contenders. Oslo is the fourth city to pull out of a race that has been thrown into turmoil in the wake of the 2014 Winter Games in Sochi, where the overall price tag was put at $51 billion, scaring off politicians and taxpayers and leaving the International Olympic Committee with a major image crisis. Oslo's fate was sealed after the ruling Conservative party failed to support financial guarantees for the bid. Lawmaker Trond Helleland said it was a split vote and the party could not propose that the government go ahead with the candidacy. The junior partner in the minority coalition voted against the bid four months ago, and polls have shown that more than 50 percent of Norwegians are opposed. Prime Minister Erna Solberg said there was not enough support to spend 35 billion kroner ($5.4 billion) on the Olympics. "It's important to get broad support for such an expensive project and there is not enough to carry through such an expensive project," she told Norwegian NRK television. "Without enthusiasm, it's not natural to carry this through." Stockholm; Krakow, Poland; and Lviv, Ukraine, withdrew their bids in recent months. Before that, potentially strong bids from St. Moritz, Switzerland, and Munich, Germany, were dropped after being rejected by voters in referendums. The IOC will select the 2022 host city on July 31, 2015, in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Beijing, which staged the 2008 Olympics, is seeking to become the first city to host both summer and winter games. Almaty, a city in Central Asia which hosted the 2011 Winter Asian Games, bid for the 2014 Olympics but failed to make the final short list. In a strongly-worded statement, IOC executive director Christophe Dubi described Norway's decision as a "missed opportunity" for the city and country. He said Norway would miss out on $880 million in sponsorship and television revenues that the IOC will provide to the 2022 host city. Dubi said the Norwegian bid team asked for a meeting with the IOC earlier this year for an explanation of all the requirements and costs. "Unfortunately, Oslo sent neither a senior member of the bid team nor a government official to this meeting," Dubi said. "For this reason senior politicians in Norway appear not to have been properly briefed on the process and were left to take their decisions on the basis of half-truths and factual inaccuracies." Oslo had seemed like the ideal candidate. Norway loves winter sports and has won the most medals in the Winter Olympics. Oslo hosted the 1952 Winter Olympics, and Norway held the widely acclaimed 1994 Games in Lillehammer. But concerns over the cost of the games and public antipathy toward the IOC proved insurmountable. "For a country of such means, full of so many successful athletes and so many fanatical winter sports fans, it is a pity that Oslo will miss out on this great opportunity to invest in its future and show the world what it has to offer," Dubi said. Norwegian IOC member Gerhard Heiberg said opposition to the bid and the IOC mounted after an incident in Sochi, when the committee reprimanded four Norwegian female cross-country skiers for wearing black armbands in memory of an athlete's brother who had died on the eve of the games. "It began with the armband case," Heiberg told NRK. Cities have been put off by the cost associated with the Sochi Games. While most of that money went to long-term regeneration and infrastructure projects, not the cost of running the games, cities remain wary of the expense. The IOC has acknowledged that it has failed to properly explain the difference between operating and capital budgets. "We lost good cities because of the bad perception of the IOC, the bad perception of how the concept could be done," former IOC executive director Gilbert Felli said recently. Cutting the cost of the games is one of the priorities of IOC President Thomas Bach, who is proposing a series of reforms — called "Olympic Agenda 2020" — to be voted on in December in Monaco. Among other things, Bach wants to add flexibility to the bidding process, allowing cities to propose their own concepts rather than adapting to a strict IOC blueprint.

What happened to our closing down, pressure off the ball high up the pitch? We are no fun to watch, what a difference from last season.

It would appear we have a significant amount of mediocre players.

This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.

I have been gagging to mock Van Gaal as I miss last season's fun and games but I have been waiting til they played this upcoming sequence of games. Will tell a lot. Would help if we could get our heads out of our arses and put a few wins together too.

Punishment. If Brendan has realised he's made a mistake in signing him, that's one thing. But I don't understand anyone here writing him off already. Personally I think an instand hit of a centre half is a rare enough thing. They deserve a couple of seasons to see if they can make it, especially the young ones, and he is still very young. He's no Torben Piechnik though he may be a Mark Wright.

I'm not denying I am a weirdo but I'm not Swedish. And in this case, England is the most interesting since England (media, twitter etc) make the most noise about Fifa and is the likeliest renegade if public opinion was brought to bear. It doesn't matter what Ireland (or Sweden) do. Besides, in Ireland we are culturally desensitised to Fifa shenanigans, the culture in Ireland is to look at them and give them a wistfully admiring 'fair play' as Fifa pulls stroke after stroke. Funny enough, I think USA making such a statement would resonate quite a lot in Fifa. There is also a higher chance than most that they could do so, with a more rigorous approach to sports governance in that country.

There's no corruption in the national committees of the top 50 countries?

This content is not viewable to guests.

I suspect the awarding of WCs was always at the upper end of the corrupto-scale, it's just we get to hear about it more now. The money being spent on new stadiums and motorways etc is impossible to rationalise but it's probably a fairly linear event from the amount of money we all pay to our versions of Sky Sports around the world, in some horrendous gargantuan mathematical equation describing the business of football.

Really? Thought hey were a special shareholder and could collect dues as a way for the Premier League to be incorporated in to 'the football family'. Wasn't it called the FA Premier League at the start? Anyway, the answer to my question is clearly that their money does come from their sponsors in the main. It is a kind of hypocrisy for us all but haven't we crossed that line donkeys years ago? Every time we go to see Liverpool play we are on some level giving a de facto approval to the capitalisation of the league, no?