Buttles

Martin Samuel is currently gasping for breath having furiously penned a piece in their defence.

The up and down on it is incredible. He’s bending it in but at 90 degrees

Woltemade confirmed. Right then

So are Spurs

The chap in the thread title is also available now

Chelsea wouldn’t go to his wage demands according to a Chelsea supporting mate

Think that’s his last play

From a corner you say

A possible way out for Alexander maybe? ”ESPN's Gabriele Marcotti has now revealed that a tweak to FIFA's transfer rules could allow the forward to force through an exit. It follows a legal case involving former Real Madrid midfielder Lassana Diarra last year. Following a court ruling, FIFA were forced to change Article 17 of their Regulations on Transfer and Status of Players. The alterations removed the governing body's power to withhold a player's transfer certificate if they breached their contract to join a new club for free. FIFA had previously been able to block the move until the matter had been resolved. The burden of proof has also shifted to the club losing the player to prove the signing club colluded with him to breach their contract. As a result, Isak could potentially join a new club as a free agent next summer if Newcastle do not sell him before the end of the current window. Article 17 can be invoked within 15 days of the final match of the season, with the Toon Army's final Premier League fixture of this term scheduled for May 24, 2026. This would give Isak until June 8 to unilaterally breach his contract and be free to sign for a new club on July 1, two years before his deal expires. Although Newcastle would be entitled to compensation, this figure could be as little as half of Liverpool's rejected bid, says Marcotti. That figure is determined by the 'damage suffered' by the club in relation to FIFA's 'positive interest' principle. The process is applied on a case-to-case basis, with Marcotti stating that in this instance Isak's remaining wages, his value to Newcastle and the cost of replacing him would be considered. Newcastle would also be able to appeal any compensation decision by FIFA to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. However, whilst this could take up to two years, the rule changes would allow Isak to join a new club immediately. It would mean the team signing him can do so for free without having to pay a transfer fee for potentially two years. The prospect of having to wait so long to receive compensation could force Newcastle into selling Isak this month.“

Wolves have had a very bad pre-season & window tbf

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

Jackson not in tonight’s squad against Leverkuesen and has been given clearance to investigate options

Really?

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

Sky reporting a bid going in from Newcastle for Sesko

Parked a couple of times on Westminster Rd on someone’s drive using the Just Park app for £15. Worked really well as was able to get out pretty quickly.

According to a friend of a friend who is high up in Telegraph Sport, the general consensus among journos is that Liverpool have behaved very poorly in all of this. As in, that we know that consensus values him at 130m, so we massively destabilise Newcastle with tapping up. Issue an insulting bid and then step back and make Isak go on strike. I did point out that this is how transfers work in response and that Newcastle are currently doing the same to Brentford. Plus journos don't usually need an excuse to say Liverpool Bad.

Joyce saying 27 Ah sorry fake account

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

They met their Waterloo

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.