OK, I've read 150 odd pages on the subject, and this is really doing my head in, yet I cannot keep away. For whats its worth, here are my thoughts. I was never really happy with the DIC bid. In a perfect world I wanted Moores to stay in place, and somehow find the money needed to fund the new stadium, and at the same time allow Rafa to sensibly compete for top players (by sensibly I mean not Chelsea style). Moores is a fan, he truly loves the club, and he doesn't meddle with its running, nor does he make a fool of himself. DIC, on the other hand, whilst reportedly being fans too, are a business, and they looked at the purchase from a business point of view - be it to raise the profile of Dubai or to sell at a profit in a few years' time. Nonetheless, I was slowly coming around to accepting what seemed as inevitable, and I took comfort in the idea that new money would be pumped into the club - both for the essential stadium project and for transfers. I realized that a top manager like Rafa, continuously courted by the likes of Real, would not hang around for much longer unless he is allowed to compete with the continent's other big clubs. Suddenly, DIC are gone, and Gillette and Hicks are poised to become the new owners. For me, the reservations I had for DIC have been replaced with reservations for Gillette and Hicks. As far as I am concerned, there is not much difference between the two. Both clearly regard the takeover as a business transaction; both intend to finance the takeover to a certain extent through loans; both have a great deal of money at their disposal, yet how much of it they will actually invest into the club we don't know. Basically we are in the dark. No one knows for certain - Parry and Moores included - how the club would be under either ownership in 5 years' time. Only time will tell, but in the meantime, the new owners - whoever they may be - deserve the benefit of the doubt; they deserve the fans' support, just like any new manager and any new player, for that is the Liverpool way.