Jump to content
I am no longer developing resources for Invision Community Suite ×
By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans.

Kvarme Ate My Food

Sponsors
  • Posts

    28,797
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Kvarme Ate My Food

  1. Have you read your own posts?
  2. This content is not viewable to guests.
  3. This content is not viewable to guests.
  4. f*** off Chewuson.
  5. If it’s not coaching, it’s not morale, it’s not form, and it’s not deliberately throwing games then what’s left?
  6. I thought you were one of the first to say “I want him gone. Now.”
  7. I don’t believe they’ll be throwing games, no. But it is possible for managers to create an environment where good players become bad. We’ve seen it happen before.
  8. If we keep that up, and add it to the points we got in the first few games, we should have enough to stay up.
  9. Since he doesn’t buy the players, and if he’s also not responsible for what they do on the pitch, then I think we are paying him way too much.
  10. Yeah, I mean human brains are more complicated than we try to make them seem. It won’t be quite as clearcut as “the manager has lost them”. But that’s a convenient shorthand for what is going on with some of them at least.
  11. Pitching for the captaincy.
  12. This content is not viewable to guests.
  13. Player safety indeed.
  14. And I’m allowed to comment on it all from a lofty position above you and him.
  15. I agree, he’s engaging in the soap opera because he’s paid to. It’s a pretty basic form of entertainment and it’s fine to find it all a bit tacky. But I can’t really blame Carragher for doing it.
  16. Being “squeaky” is just his accent, that’s how a lot of people talk in north Liverpool.
  17. Which clubs do this successfully? Have a stable DoF, a style of football that doesn’t change when managers change, and consistent success without frequent overhauls of the squad? I’m not suggesting they don’t exist, I’m legit interested.
  18. Maybe I’m too Liverpool-centric but we do always sell and buy loads of players within a year of getting a new boss.
  19. I’m not saying Hughes is responsible for our current malaise, maybe he is and maybe he isn’t. But I do know that if we were top of the league and the signings were flying, he’d be gladly taking the credit.
  20. This doesn’t allow for changes in style though, which are often what is needed after a Head Coach has failed.
  21. Haha I like Souey again these days and I don’t mind him calling me a muppet.
  22. And who are they to decide a philosophy, when they’ve never coached a team? And what happens when their philosophy is wrong? You have to sack them and rebuild the club, same as you would if a manager had set the philosophy.
  23. They don’t have to do it all themselves. They just need to have the power to make the final decision, and to sack s*** coaches and s*** scouts.
  24. The players don’t all go when a manager is sacked either. I know the idea with a DoF model is that there is continuity, but it rarely works that way. A new Head Coach comes in and he has different ideas and needs different players.
  25. I mainly dislike it because it blurs the line between who is a football person and who is a suit who should sign the cheques and shut his mouth.
×
×
  • Create New...