Walrus

Going for 16-2 to stay true to the average.

Same as it ever was: Yin meets Yang.

Great insight into his training methods and relationship with Klopp here: https://www.theguardian.com/football/2019/dec/02/liverpool-pep-lijnders-jurgen-klopp-assistant-paddle-tennis-james-milner

I’m probably not making myself clear here. I basically think that fans will always find a way to explain why we definitely need to win this game today based on another result. When in reality the two games’ results are not linked in any meaningful way. I’ll stop now though!

I understand nerves. I don’t agree that City winning/drawing/losing makes our players more nervous than they otherwise would’ve been. If that were the case, you wouldn’t see this sort of posts after all possible outcomes. You can bet your bottom dollar that the following or similar would’ve been posted had Jonjo hit the post: ” DeBruyne’s late winner makes us REALLY REALLY have to win today. ”

This argument is often used both ways. ”City won, so now we deffo need to win too” and ”City lost points, now we definitely must win!” I don’t get this sort of logic at all. You just need to win anyway.

Well to be fair, 2-1 was always on the cards. Right? RIGHT???

How can he blow the whistle WHILE Adrian is standing against the post???

You’re all welcome

Jonjo!!!

I just think of it as similar as our games. The better side usually wins in the end.

I would boldly predict a 2-1 win with a late winner.

In the last 18 months we’ve been to more Champions League finals than we’ve lost league games.

Our goal difference is only third best in the league. I’m not happy. We need to beat someone 10-0.

They scored again then or what? Don’t like to read these comments.

Is that the added time?

Haha, had we scored when I wrote this?

Well. It was always 1-2 and we always score late.

How long left?

1-1?

Thank God

? He scored?

What hope is there for the rest of us if a financially doped tram can win a treble?