Cobs

This content is not viewable to guests.

He scored 11 in 32 league games last season for City i think that stacks up against Baros (19 in 67 league games), Cisse (8 in 35) , Morientes (6 in 27) & Crouch (4 in 18) whilst playing in the Premier League for Liverpool

This content is not viewable to guests.

£4.2M

KYFS

Hurrah! the irish mafia can all feck off!!!!

This content is not viewable to guests.

I've seen it working for 90,000+ at a stadium you still need stewards inside the ground though

This content is not viewable to guests.

i can't think of one free kick where the player has aimed for one side of the goal and it's gone in the other and the watching world has claimed it to be genius. striking the ball mid game as it falls to you on the volley and taking a free kick in your own time are very different.

This content is not viewable to guests.

thanks a 'shot' to the near post that goes in at the far post?

i've called it a fluke in my first post on the thread and it was, you've done nothing to disprove that. You've claimed he meant it, you've claimed it was genius - it wasn't either.

just as long as you don't pick any reds, Kahnee - we don't want any of our players dead.

- it's not the same quote at all the first link i posted said he admits it didn't go where he intended it to (without actually saying where he intended to hit it) the second one is his team mate saying Ronaldinho admitted that he told him he was aiming for the other side of the goal the third one is Ronaldinho saying he was going for the other side of the goal I've always thought it to be a mis-hit cross and can only base that on what it looked like to me. If Ronaldinho's telling the truth, fair play i'm wrong on that. How he thought he'd beat Seaman at his near post, hitting the ball with his instep from that range i don't know The fact of the matter is, to aim for one side of the goal and hit the other if that really is what happened is still a fluke. If you don't believe that i suggest you go look up the word fluke in a dictionary.

How do you like them apples ?

The player himself is the one who is saying it didn't go where he intended it to - i can only assume if his intention was to score he would have been putting it to one side or the other of the keeper as straight into the middle of the goal would have surely been to easy to save? If that goal was evidence of his undoubted genius surely the man would know which side of the goal he was shooting at? so you tell me where you think he intended it to go - it's clearly beyond sean to answer my question. FWIW i think it was a cross, i thought it at the time and having downloaded it this morning and watched it another 10 or so times i still think it was a cross. sorry.

Fluke don't be daft - Lampard only scores with deflections

How is it that Michael Owen is a schithouse for signing for Newcastle's stupid money and not telling Madrid he would only go to Liverpool yet SWP is told by his club he HAS to go for an inflated price to Chelsea and can only yield to their demands?

and he doesn't smack every 40 yard free kick into the top corner of the goal either. total fluke.

not sure about the bit in bold but the rest is fair enough If Fulham can pay £1M for Niemi - we should get some cash for Jerzy - £3M is a bit steep mebbe but i'm sure we'd accept less.

This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.

St Johnstone

got a feeling 1 is Blackpool (mebbe heard it ina pub quiz or summat)