got a few mates who are City fans, said he's been rubbish whenever he's played this season.
Still getting £60m+ for a player they don't want. City have stolen our crown as the best selling club.
If FSG have said there is only £40m to spend in January, then it beggars belief that the footballing side of the club chose to spend that on a forward rather than a midfielder.
unless I'm missing part of that statement it does not mention anywhere about where an investor is from and the government to intervene if they are not from Liverpool or Manchester
Bad news Pearce has a particularly pessimistic article The Athletic.
Basically we have no one worth selling that will generate the cash to buy Bellingham.
I'm sure it is because I don't understand the finances of football but I'm still confused by how other clubs with comparable or less revenues seem to be able to spend more than we can do.