Are these figures correct?

[nvdm]

I realise it doesn't really matter, but was just wondering if Utd paid more for Anderson than we did for Torres:

 

Anderson 31.5m Porto / Manchester Utd.

Torres 30.0 Atletico de Madrid / Liverpool

Nani 25.5 Benfica / Manchester Utd.

Hargreaves 25.0 Bayern Munich / Manchester Utd.

Bent 24.5 Charlton A. / Tottenham Hotspur

Malouda 21.0 Lyon / Chelsea

Babel 17.0 Feyenoord / Liverpool

Elano 13.0 Shakhtar / Manchester City

 

From here: http://www.footballeconomy.com/world.htm

[Bo Benn]

I thought teamtalk, skysports et al agreed we paid 26.5 for Torres?

[_00_deathscar]

According to ask.com, E30m is equal to £20.2m - so the Torres figures seems about right, as does the Babel one.

 

I thought teamtalk, skysports et al agreed we paid 26.5 for Torres?

 

Therefore it's also agreed that no one with any modicum of knowledge should believe 'em about anything football related.

[nvdm]

That Darren Bent transfer fee could yet prove to be one of the most laughable mistakes in modern times.

[ManxRed]

25.5M Euros for Nani? If he was any good Man U would've been 4-0 up at half time against Citeh on Sunday.

[Bo Benn]

Oh, it was in euros! Sorry

[crisps]

Nani didnt even come from Benfica so they're obviously accurate

 

Babel feyenoord

Edited August 23, 2007 by crisps

[surf]

Anderson and Nani were both reported at 17m pounds. Torres was reported at 20m pounds.

[Hassony]

That Darren Bent transfer fee could yet prove to be one of the most laughable mistakes in modern times.

 

or it could prove to be a master stroke