Football factory or money pit?

[LondonLiverpoolFan]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/6303863.stm

 

Football factory or money pit?

By Matt Slater

 

In November 2004, five months into his new job at Anfield, Rafa Benitez watched an inexperienced Liverpool side, packed with talent from the club's academy in Kirkby, knock holders Middlesbrough out of the Carling Cup.

 

Two goals from Neil Mellor won the match but it was the all-round contribution of the youngsters - Mellor, Richie Partridge, Darren Potter, Stephen Warnock, John Welsh, Zak Whitbread and French prospect Florent Sinama Pongolle - that won praise from their Spanish manager that night.

 

Fast forward to December 2006, however, and Benitez is telling all and sundry that the academy is failing him and failing English football.

 

"You must improve the English academy system because it is simply not working," he moaned.

 

One month later and the reason for Rafa's rant became apparent - a humiliating 6-3 home defeat to a side not too dissimilar to Arsenal's under-18s revealed just how bare Liverpool's cupboard had become, particularly compared to the bulging shelves in Arsene Wenger's cosmopolitan pantry.

 

Within a few weeks the story had come full circle: Liverpool's long-standing academy boss, Steve Heighway, had announced that he would retire in May and the last of those seven youngsters that played Boro had left the club.

 

So what went wrong with Liverpool's highway to the first team's Melwood base? How did a club that has spent almost £3m a year on perhaps the country's best-appointed football factory misplace the formula that once produced Jamie Carragher, Robbie Fowler, Steven Gerrard, Steve McManaman and Michael Owen?

 

The simple answer is that there is no simple answer - ask 10 different people involved in youth development and you get 10 different answers, one for each of the Liverpool academy's perfectly tended grass pitches.

 

And that is perhaps why the ongoing review of the academy system has been going on so long.

 

The Football Association, Football League and Premier League have been discussing how best to improve youth development, and how to pay for it, since the summer. The wait for the white smoke of success from Soho Square's chimney continues.

 

In the meantime, most Premier League clubs continue to look abroad for quick fixes and less risky medium-term investments, while pundits wonder where England's next crop of international stars are going to learn their trade.

 

Only 19 of the 54 players (35%) that came to top-flight clubs during the recent transfer window were English. And it is not uncommon now for only a third of the men on display during a Premiership weekend to be eligible for the national team. That's just 80 players, hardly the broadest of bases on which to construct your pyramid of excellence.

 

But a conveyor belt on the blink is not just Liverpool's problem. Only two of Chelsea's current first-year apprentices come from their academy and there are not too many recent additions to the Manchester United academy's roll of honour.

 

That said, the general mood in the academies is rosier than Benitez's comments would suggest, and the Spaniard, to be fair, would have been better served directing his frustrations at Kirkby. After all, Gerard Houllier, the man Benitez replaced, also clashed with Heighway over the academy's productivity.

 

And as Howard Wilkinson, the man who got the academy ball rolling, put it, what does Benitez know about English academies other than Liverpool's?

 

"Benitez's time in England and his experiences with the academy system are confined to Liverpool," said the former FA technical director, who wrote the book on academies back in 1997 with his Charter for Quality.

 

"He would be highly proficient to speak about what goes on there. But I find it difficult to imagine he would be able to speak on behalf of the rest of the country. Youth development here has improved and is continuing to improve."

 

Putting aside the indignation of a proud Yorkshireman defending his work, there is a lot of truth in everything Wilkinson said.

 

But Benitez's views are echoed elsewhere, and sometimes in the most unexpected corners.

 

It is no surprise to hear Wenger berate Uefa for attempting to enforce home-grown quotas, or even Jose Mourinho say Chelsea's reserves would be better off competing in the Football League, but it is more of a shock when the chairman of Torquay United comes to Benitez's defence.

 

"My predecessor at Plainmoor scrapped (the centre of excellence) but I would have done the same," said Chris Roberts, who took over at the Devon club last October.

 

"They cost a fortune and 95% of the kids don't make it. They're just cast aside.

 

"It doesn't work at all - for the clubs or the kids. It's like trawling for whales with a sardine net. There is no social or moral consideration."

 

Roberts' answer is to create partnerships with local colleges. The club provides some coaching and access to a decent groundsman and physio, and the colleges' very best players are given a trial.

 

This is definitely cheaper than Liverpool's full-fat approach, but will it help the Gulls out of their immediate plight? They are currently five points from safety at the foot of League Two.

 

Simon Clifford, who founded the successful Brazilian Soccer Schools and Socatots coaching franchises, is another outspoken critic.

 

"The Charter for Quality is probably the biggest reason we're not producing the players we should. They should rip it up," said Clifford, who lasted less than a year at Southampton after being brought in by Sir Clive Woodward - another football outsider with a sympathetic ear for new methods.

 

Clifford's problems with the perceived wisdom are numerous - out-dated coaching methods, too much focus on competition too young, not enough time spent on skills and many, many more - but can be condensed into one central tenet: our young players are not playing nearly enough of the right type of football.

 

Most coaches would agree with the quantity issue - access to the players still at school is a huge issue for all academies - and many would agree on the quality point too - many advocate Clifford's 'more touches, less matches' approach, for example - but the vast majority are of the view that the Charter for Quality needs updating, not shredding.

 

Jim Cassell, the director of Manchester City's vibrant academy, is convinced that there is not much wrong with the current system, which is, after all, only in its ninth year.

 

And Huw Jennings, the Premier League's youth development manager and former boss of Southampton's academy, is another in the "small tweaks" camp. As is Graham Hawkins, Jennings's counterpart at the Football League.

 

Where all three agree with Clifford is on the ability of English footballers to meet the challenge of playing in a "world league" like the Premiership.

 

Clifford is adamant that the best foreign players are "manufactured" and sees no reason why English youngsters cannot match their athleticism and skills, given the right amount of good coaching. Jennings largely concurs and believes it is already happening.

 

"The real issue now is what happens between 18 and 21," said Jennings. "We need to make sure we get the structure right for them to flourish.

 

"Currently, some go on loan, some play in the reserves and some find their paths blocked for whatever reason. That's a massive conundrum for us.

 

"I think this is what the likes of Benitez are frustrated about. They see the massive potential of our academy structure, which drew on the experience of others in Europe, but they are seeing some of that labour lost because of players failing to break through.

 

"But we are producing more technical, more athletic, more intelligent footballers. I am very optimistic about the future."

 

Given the arrival of American tycoons George Gillett and Tom Hicks at Anfield, Benitez is probably optimistic about the future too.

 

Whether that future includes a liberal helping of home-grown locals in the first team is anybody's guess. But the fact that he has just brought in six new players, four of them teenagers and none of them English, suggests not.

[Maldini]

Interesting article, I think they underplay the problem though. I've been saying for a long time that the academy needs to be set up like a boarding school system where the players come in at about 12.

[Gray - YPC]

I think the B team system in Spain seems to work well, ensuring kids aged 18-21 are getting regular competitive football at those ages.

 

However I love the fact we've got lower leagues and the dream of those clubs making it so they can mix it with the big boys!

[Guest Cardie]

I think the B team system in Spain seems to work well, ensuring kids aged 18-21 are getting regular competitive football at those ages.

 

However I love the fact we've got lower leagues and the dream of those clubs making it so they can mix it with the big boys!

 

Spain has both.

[Guest Cardie]

The other option is to go dutch and forge a formal/informal partnership with an existing club, there are plenty of smaller clubs in and around the area we could use to help develop players from Tranmere to Crewe, Chester, Wrexham, Everton.

[DanielS]

The other option is to go dutch and forge a formal/informal partnership with an existing club, there are plenty of smaller clubs in and around the area we could use to help develop players from Tranmere to Crewe, Chester, Wrexham, Everton.

 

Because of the cup competitions there are rules against engaging with smaller clubs in that way. Might be an idea to look at clubs in Scotland, Ireland or the Welsh leagues though.

Edited February 8, 2007 by DanielS

[AE]

Because of the cup competitions there are rules against engaging with smaller clubs in that way. Might be an idea to look at clubs in Scotland, Ireland or the Welsh leagues though.

 

Improve the quality of the SPL wouldn't it.

But what about all those journeymen players they have up there?

[Guest JV]

The other option is to go dutch and forge a formal/informal partnership with an existing club, there are plenty of smaller clubs in and around the area we could use to help develop players from Tranmere to Crewe, Chester, Wrexham, Everton.

[Logic]

The other option is to go dutch and forge a formal/informal partnership with an existing club, there are plenty of smaller clubs in and around the area we could use to help develop players from Tranmere to Crewe, Chester, Wrexham, Everton.

[anfield11]

Interesting article, I think they underplay the problem though. I've been saying for a long time that the academy needs to be set up like a boarding school system where the players come in at about 12.

 

 

 

I think the banning of video games and getting young lads out in the fields kicking a ball around again would help!! :-) Oh, f*ck the :-), I'm serious.

[growler]

exactly, the problem is where to play? I moved from england to australia, and wherever I go here, there are always parks, tennis courts, greens, golf courses. I had to drive 20 minutes to get a pitch in England.

 

How many schools have sold off their fields?

 

Teams should look to work closer with local schools as well as having a focussed academy.

 

I do think though, that the extra money coming in next year a certain portion should be assigned to certain targets, at least the overseas money anyway.

 

the clubs should agree that the money from overseas viewing (625million I think) should exclusively go on:

 

Lower league acadamies

lowering season tickets

local awareness/charities/good deeds

ground development

Internal system development (ticketing, security, admin etc)

[suzyv]

I think that a lot of the problem is due to the fact that once they sign for a club they are no longer allowed to play for a sunday league team. I think it is a shame and that some how since they have stopped this the kids comming through seam to be missing something.

[hagi_complex]

Very interesting article. This bit is something I've felt strongly about for a long time:

 

too much focus on competition too young, not enough time spent on skills and many, many more - but can be condensed into one central tenet: our young players are not playing nearly enough of the right type of football.

 

I see it even now with my two nephews (11 and 8) and I remember it from my own playing days. The emphasis, even at these young ages, is on winning. Competitive Dad type a******s on the sidelines and the teams run by their mates. 11 year olds playing on full size pitches with full size balls. The biggest lads getting picked and the game reverting to brute force.

 

Now, I'm generalising and talking specifically about what I've been exposed to (I haven't a clue what goes on in the academies), but certainly in Dublin, I've seen very little change in the twenty years plus from when I was playing at that age, to what I'm watching now. If the same thing is applying (albeit at a higher level) in the academies, well then they're doomed.

 

I know this is not happening in Holland, for starters.

[Dule]

I think that 1 way we could improve not only the technical ability of the players, but also the awareness of what is around them is to play them on smaller pitches. Over here in Australia, one of the best youth teams in my region get there players to play normally through out the week, but also have them player indoor football during the week.

 

Even at trainings they play on smaller pitches to make them have less time on the ball to improve control and awareness.

 

Too much emphasis is put on strength and physicallity these days, and its affecting the way football is played, and the ability of most of these footballers.

 

Sure the game was slower back in the 70's and 80's, but the intelligence of the players on the ball, the skills, the whole package was something to behold, and sadly we have lost that, i think Fowler made a comment about that back in the Houlier days.

[Guest bc@cpsu.asn.au]

I think that 1 way we could improve not only the technical ability of the players, but also the awareness of what is around them is to play them on smaller pitches. Over here in Australia, one of the best youth teams in my region get there players to play normally through out the week, but also have them player indoor football during the week.

 

Even at trainings they play on smaller pitches to make them have less time on the ball to improve control and awareness.

 

Too much emphasis is put on strength and physicallity these days, and its affecting the way football is played, and the ability of most of these footballers.

 

Sure the game was slower back in the 70's and 80's, but the intelligence of the players on the ball, the skills, the whole package was something to behold, and sadly we have lost that, i think Fowler made a comment about that back in the Houlier days.

 

Not sure if you saw recently on SBS (Australian TV) a recent plan has been put forward that virtually all young footballers will start off playing futsal. Once again, more touches less, less time, less dependant on physical size.

[fyds]

I think the banning of video games and getting young lads out in the fields kicking a ball around again would help!! :-) Oh, f*ck the :-), I'm serious.

You're not wrong...we're developing an entire generation of lard-a*ses with over developed thumbs and short fuses. Add to that, thanks to the scummy tabloids impressionable parents think there is a gary Glitter behind everay bush so their little darlings are safer being baby-sat by a PSP and you get an idea of the scale of the problem.

 

I know it's old farty and all, that - but growing up in Kirkby we would pile home after school, wolf some tea, and all be out playing footy in the street - Thommo, Terry mac, Dennis Mortimer, Tommy Caton and many others who went to lower league teams all doing this within a square mile of each other. I can't remember the last time I saw kids playing footy in the street. 'No Ball Games', the likes of 'Splinter Cell', paranoia and the rule of the car have ended all this.

 

The pool of local british talent any academy can draw on has shrunk beyond measure - and i doubt it's just our problem.

[_00_deathscar]

It's an array of different problems, as has been mentioned. Everything from video games to lack of pitches to over-competitiveness to playing the wrong type of footy has been mentioned and as a result it's affecting football (in England) as we know it. Too many athletes and monsters without much footballing brain/skill/ability are allowed to get through, even the likes of our Momo being an example.