Spike Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 It's a term often used when the club sign a player and one which seems to excite the fans (see the endless threads in the past about Duff etc) as though it will add something extra to the signing in terms of will to win if he is one. This season we have Bellamy and Pennant - both of which have yet to convince, and even in the past, players such as Spud were often the target of fan's disdain. So I want to ask this question - how much does being a boyhood red actually mean when we sign a player? It's something that appears to make us want them more as if it's going to make them better for us. However, I'd like to offer the following point. It doesn't. Perhaps by them being lifelong Liverpool fans gives, as supporters us a burden of overexpectation upon them, that they'll see and want things as passionately we do, and perhaps heaps more pressure on them when they fail to immediately deliver in their first season. After all they are fans and so perhaps our criticisms and moans at the match hurt them more than the heartless professional who'll look at things objectively, pick themselves up, brush themselves down and get on with it. It doesn't affect them as much. Most boyhood reds who I can think of that have been successful, and beholden by the fans, have come through the ranks. We've even had several blues who have changed sides from their early years to when they signed professional forms - one of which is the epitomy of our club now. Similarly, and I could be accused of being selective in the examples here, but in Kuyt we have someone that simply loves the game, whoever he plays for, and in Agger someone who admits beyond playing has no interest in the game. So what really does boyhood red mean to you? Would you rather a cold hearted professional (the likes of solskjaer who despite being at them lot always delivers)? Should we stop thinking of this as being no more meaningful than the fact that they support us and allow them to settle in? Should we give scouse a chance?
hideNseek Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 The moral is only buy boyhood reds who are good.
Guest Kev Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 Times have changed, unfortunately old c**** like me are still stuck there. Boyhood reds were everywhere when I was a kid, these days we seen to have more boyhood blues You have some good points there and maybe the 'tag' is designed for the fans to 'love' more. eg Bellamy £6m and Pennant £7m (you mentioned those), because they were given the 'tag' made us (or me) accept them more, because if they didn't have that 'tag' then maybe I would think they are after a hefty wage each month
Kahnee Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 It can have one of two extreme effects IMHO - there's the Gerrard effect (game improves year on year, boosted by pride in shirt), or there's the Pennant/Bellamy effect (weight of expectation has a detremental effect on the players game)
Spike Posted November 30, 2006 Author Posted November 30, 2006 You have some good points there and maybe the 'tag' is designed for the fans to 'love' more. eg Bellamy £6m and Pennant £7m (you mentioned those), because they were given the 'tag' made us (or me) accept them more, because if they didn't have that 'tag' then maybe I would think they are after a hefty wage each month there's a lot of truth in that but it's performances that make them value for money not their allegiance. I must admit I was well disappointed when I read about Agger not caring about football, thought he was a bit of a c*** to be honest, for someone so gifted. Yet at the end of the day he delivers for the 90.
Kahnee Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 there's a lot of truth in that but it's performances that make them value for money not their allegiance. I must admit I was well disappointed when I read about Agger not caring about football, thought he was a bit of a c*** to be honest, for someone so gifted. Yet at the end of the day he delivers for the 90. admired him for saying that - at a new club in a new country, and still strong enough to admit that football is just a job and he's not actually a fan? Shows a certin strength of character
Spike Posted November 30, 2006 Author Posted November 30, 2006 I know Kahn, but it kind of proves my point. At the end of the day their allegiance means s*** all.
Kahnee Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 I know Kahn, but it kind of proves my point. At the end of the day their allegiance means s*** all. Been the case for a while now, mate. Just look at Rooney (as a recent example)
Guest Kev Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 OK. let's pick a team of boyhood reds then (not all current Liverpool players)- modern day: G. ???RB. ???CH. ???CH. ???LB. Ste WarnockRM. Jermaine PennantCM. Kevin NolanCM. ???LM. Harry KewellF. Craig BellamyF. ???
floyd Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 OK. let's pick a team of boyhood reds then (not all current Liverpool players)- modern day: G. ???RB. ???CH. ???CH. ???LB. Ste WarnockRM. Jermaine PennantCM. Kevin NolanCM. ???LM. Harry KewellF. Craig BellamyF. ???G. Tony WarnerRB. ???CH. Anton FerdinandCH. Rio FerdinandLB. Ste WarnockRM. Jermaine PennantCM. Kevin NolanCM. Steven ReidLM. Harry KewellF. Craig BellamyF. Solskjær
hideNseek Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 Play David Thompson out of position at rb.
floyd Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 (edited) isn't Neill a red? or am i making that up?nope, think your right, it's the Craig "skippy" Johnston effectMost of the players last night, could of done with half his energy Edited November 30, 2006 by floyd
Guest Kev Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 Little known CM called Steven Gerrard? Nah, he's a boyhood chav G. Tony WarnerRB. ???CH. Anton FerdinandCH. Rio FerdinandLB. Ste WarnockRM. Jermaine PennantCM. Kevin NolanCM. Steven GerrardLM. Harry KewellF. Craig BellamyF. Solskjær
Kahnee Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 Nah, he's a boyhood chav Not according to that Sky programme he's not
Spike Posted November 30, 2006 Author Posted November 30, 2006 OK. let's pick a team of boyhood reds then (not all current Liverpool players)- modern day: G. ???RB. ???CH. ???CH. ???LB. Ste WarnockRM. Jermaine PennantCM. Kevin NolanCM. ???LM. Harry KewellF. Craig BellamyF. ??? you did that on purpose didn't you turning my thread into a formation one Murphy
andymac Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 Play David Thompson out of position at rb. Thought he was supposed to be Blue. Wes Brown (I believe) Wayne Routledge (or at least he was being touted as red when we were linked with him)Chris Kirkland Emile Heskey Leighton BainesTheo WalcottPhil Jevons
anny road Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 leighton Baines is ridiculously red Alan smith, both ferdinands, Solksjaer, Wes Brown, Kev Nolan, Spud, Heskey, Litmanen, Pennant, Gerrard, Warnock, Thierry Henry Craig Bellamy is CArdiff
Spike Posted December 1, 2006 Author Posted December 1, 2006 so the message is dONt sIgN BOyHOoD rEdZ
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now