Rafa and rotation article

[D.Boon]

From the Times.

 

here

[muleskinner]

For me, the rotation stuff is a non story. When it is proven to work and is employed by the most succesful managers working in the game today, what is the problem?

[chrisbonnie]

the only annoying thing about rotation is defending it to your muppet mates that get brainwashed by the papers

 

i couldnt care less how many players we use, i for one agreed 100% with the changes made for the Bolton game, Aurelio was dire against Galatasary, he could hardly play the next game against the horrible Bolton,

 

the prozone statistics are interesting, you`d never think Crouch would run more than Gerrard, ok, i personally think Gerrard is a lazy pup, but you`d never think a forward could run that much, id love to see the stats on Kuyt

 

good article that, very interesting, id like to know more about the workings of rafa, the fitness tests, the scientific end of things, its quite interesting

[Paddy 66]

Whatever Rafa wants to do is fine by me, those that question rotation are questioning whether Rafa is right and we all know he is.

[Maldini]

Rotation is what zonal marking was this time last year and what 4-5-1 was this time two years ago.

[fyds]

Rotation is what zonal marking was this time last year and what 4-5-1 was this time two years ago.

Exactly - food for numpties.

[Spike]

Rotation has brought us to second only to Chelsea in top flight trophies won since Rafa has been here.

 

Another significant thing is the fact that apart from Harry we have had few serious injuries in these past twelve months or so.

[Maldini]

I bet we've probably won more points in the league in that period than Chelsea or United. Any of the stattos want to check?

[owenthomas]

decent article that..