Keita Posted April 25, 2008 Share Posted April 25, 2008 http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-n...00252-20818965/ Third time lucky for Reds' stadium?Apr 25 2008 by Nick Coligan, Liverpool Echo LIVERPOOL FC’s third stadium plan is set to get the go-ahead next week. City planners have recommended the £350m proposal for a 60,000-seater ground is approved by councillors.. However, progress on the stadium is likely to remain in doubt as long as the ownership stand-off continues. Liverpool’s original building plan for Stanley Park was backed by the council as far back as 2004. American owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett ordered a massive redesign when they took over the club last year and their plan was approved last summer. But it was shelved and redrawn a second time by Dallas-based architects HKS earlier this year when the tycoons decided it was too expensive. Next month, councillors will have their say on a scheme showing a number of crucial changes, including: The future capacity of New Anfield, after any expansion, has been reduced from 76,000 to 73,000. The underground car park beneath the stadium has been halved in size. A three-storey car park will be located under tennis courts and a games area in Stanley Park, shielded from Priory Road by a “green wall”. The width, length and height of the stadium has been reduced by several metres. The roof opening is smaller and designed differently to keep the crowd dry and help the pitch grow. Plans for public viewing areas, a “skywalk” and roof terrace restaurant in the new Kop stand have been scrapped. The redesign does not affect the restoration of the remainder of Stanley Park, which is underway and expected to finish in December. A council report says: “The overall form of the stadium, with the Kop as the main generator of the building form will add to the city skyline, and create a positive landmark and a focus for further investment. “The changes introduced in March do little to dilute the architectural quality of the proposed stadium.” Planners said the scheme should be agreed if Liverpool agreed to meet certain conditions. The club must make sure spectators leaving their cars in the stadium’s 970 parking spaces arrive an hour before kick-off and wait an hour after the final whistle to leave. It must also pay for a yearly review of the residents-only parking zone around Anfield for five years after the ground opens – and fund any expansion of it. Several community groups have objected to the plan, including Priory Area Residents Association (Para), Friends of Stanley Park and Stanley Park Preservation Society. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armin_Tamzarian Posted April 25, 2008 Share Posted April 25, 2008 I hope it gets called in and permission refused. It might persuade the current parasites to f*** off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muleskinner Posted April 25, 2008 Share Posted April 25, 2008 What about it being 70,000? Am I missing something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainXabi Posted April 25, 2008 Share Posted April 25, 2008 What about it being 70,000? Am I missing something?Ask for 60k first, ask for 70k later. It's always been the plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rimbeux Posted April 25, 2008 Share Posted April 25, 2008 Ask for 60k first, ask for 70k later. It's always been the plan. And a dodgy one at that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jas Posted April 25, 2008 Share Posted April 25, 2008 Ask for 60k first, ask for 70k later. It's always been the plan. haven't we already asked for, and got, 60k? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBain Posted April 25, 2008 Share Posted April 25, 2008 We had permission for 55k originally then we got permission for the hks design. Then we changed it again so we had to start from scratch If Hicks starts building work we should sabotage it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainXabi Posted April 25, 2008 Share Posted April 25, 2008 haven't we already asked for, and got, 60k?I guess the redesigned stadium was different enough to require a new planning application. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarg Armani Posted April 25, 2008 Share Posted April 25, 2008 If Hicks starts building work we should sabotage it if hicks starts building work we should push him in a cement mixer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBain Posted April 25, 2008 Share Posted April 25, 2008 if hicks starts building work we should push him in a cement mixer. Given how fat the c*** is that would deffo count as sabotage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fyds Posted April 26, 2008 Share Posted April 26, 2008 This will be a moot point until DIC buy in - Hicks can't fund buying out Gillett - let alone exposing himself to funding a stadium on only a 50% share of ownership. The spade is as far away from the soil as ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now