DGMO

Fantastic viewing, it really was. You can understand its worldwide appeal when you see the quality they churn out. Great stuff to watch The Deep South segment was terrific wasn't it?

That compiliation is scary. All this talk about him being finished is so absurd. Everyone would think he's a failure from the abuse he's received at Madrid. Just read on the BBC: Ronaldo has scored 69 league goals for Real in 98 appearances. Pretty good ratio that in my books for a fat, injury prone has-been. Would've loved to have seen him in the Premiership.

Unprecendented what the General has said MoD/Downing Street have replied with the usual twaddle of being there with the 'democratic' wishes of the Iraqi's blah blah

If you look at June this year, nearly 3200 Iraqi civilians were killed and in July around 3400. That's nearly 7000 in 2 months, in a country of only 25 million I was hearing on the radio last night that 300,000 Iraqi's have been displaced since February because of the war. But wait, Iraq is free now

Well to an extent, but he wasn't OTT. Nevertheless, very powerful when on screen. But agree with Scot in that Damon and Di Caprio were the stars, but they had excellent support. Winstone, Wahlberg, Baldwin and Sheen is quite something. I saw trailers for De Niro's next picture The Good Shephard also starring Damon, and that looks very promisng too.

Saw it tonight and thought it was a brilliant film. What a star cast and what acting. Nicholson was immense. I just hope Scorsese gets his long overdue Best Director Oscar after this. Anyone else seen it? Highly recommended

This is so slow paced, so laboured. We seem so ineffective in the final third, no slick movement or directness at all. Seems that throw-ins and corners are our best hope

Could see Pennant on the left. I remember him switching over there against West Ham with Garcia. Could be that him and Gerrard interchange.

Just seen the opening report on the BBC Ten O'Clock News and it was hard to take and see what's happening to the Lebanese. Talk about recruitment material for more 9/11's and 7/7's.

Pennant having a medical according to Telegraph breaking news

Agreed. Not sure how many people saw his exchange with the Deputy Israeli Ambassador in the studio, but it's definitely worth watching: Jon Snow v Deputy Israeli Ambassador

Well stay away or you could meet the same fate as these unfortunate Canadians: 8 Canadians Killed in Israeli Airstrike Wonder how the Canadian government will react to this

Interesting to hear what Putin was saying. Maybe he sees something far-reaching in Israel's bombardment: "It is our impression that aside from seeking to return the abducted soldiers, Israel is pursuing wider goals," Putin said. He did not elaborate. Link Wish he did elaborate

The US stated a day or so back that they're fully supporting Israel. What's new?

Don't see a great deal happening following the current deafening silence from the US and Europe. This seems to be an early indication of the way things will pan out IMO: U.S. vetoes U.N. condemnation of Israel

It's extremely strange isn't it? There's a thread about this being discussed in the forum as well . Looking on the Yahoo homepage for instance, the main news story is that Israel are looking for 2 missing soldiers. No sight of 200+ people having been killed by 7 blasts in one of the main financial centres of Asia

Absolute legend in the way he's dictated play in the 2nd half. That spinning top in the 72nd minute whilst surrounded by Brazil players had me standing and applauding his genius.

Ronaldo is over the hill, Zidane is over the hill............

But Ribery plays on the left

Possible Romario, but haven't seen a thread devoted to this interview conducted by Henry Winter. Barnes Urges Starry-Eyed England To Play As One By : Henry Winter, 13/06/2006 John Barnes believes that England will never win the World Cup again unless they learn from Brazil that the team is the real star, and that leading lights such as Steven Gerrard must "sacrifice" themselves for the tactical cause. The illustrious former England international also argues that England must abandon their high-tempo approach in summer tournaments. "If the World Cup was in October I would fancy England every time," Barnes said yesterday. "If we can play at our tempo for 90 minutes, even Brazil would find it hard to cope. In October we can. In the summer we can't. Sven-Goran Eriksson said heat would not be a factor in Germany as we were 30 per cent fitter than at the last World Cup. Now we are saying: 'It's hot!' We knew it would be hot, so let's prepare. "In the friendlies building up to the World Cup, England should practise a much slower tempo, keeping the ball. We shouldn't get the ball forward quicker, we shouldn't let Lampard or Gerrard go steaming forward at every opportunity because their energy levels deplete. "Everyone says: 'England should win the World Cup.' England should not win the World Cup because of the heat, the tempo, and because other countries have players equally as good who play a better style of football. Brazil have the edge over everyone because, regardless of whether you are Ronaldo or Ronaldinho, the most important thing is Brazil, and the way the team functions. "English players should be sacrificing themselves for the team. Sven's not doing that. He's saying 'Go out and play' to his midfield and they are all attacking midfielders for their clubs. Phil Scolari and Guus Hiddink wouldn't stand for that. "Brazil, Argentina and Portugal have a DNA, a way of playing - the team comes first. England say we are going to win because of Beckham's qualities, rather than the way the team functions. But are Beckham's free-kicks better than Juninho's for Brazil? No. Is Beckham's delivery better than Juan Riquelme's for Argentina? Maybe. But Riquelme and Juninho play in a way that suits the team. "Beckham has great qualities, fine, but playing long balls over the top is not a pattern of play. When Beckham gives three balls to Owen, everyone goes: 'Look at that delivery!' But what's he doing the rest of the time? Put together the total of Beckham's crosses and through balls, and Lampard's runs forward, and it's five minutes. In England we focus so much on individuals - Lampard, Beckham, Gerrard, and Joe Cole - that we don't have a way of playing. We expect those individuals to win the game for us. England's four in midfield are excellent but they don't complement each other. Scolari or Hiddink would look at the way the team plays, and if that means not having [one of the stars]... they would change it. "Sven has to give them guidance about what he wants from a team perspective. When England played Paraguay, you could see with the midfielders' shooting - Gerrard's volley, Lampard's volley - that each was thinking: 'I am going to stamp my authority on this game by scoring a spectacular goal. I am The One'. Three of the attempts should have been played simple. "Gerrard can do everything but Eriksson should say: 'You have to play like Claude Makelele, get the ball, don't spray 50-yard balls, don't burst forward as you do for Liverpool, but play for the team pattern, play one touch and allow Lampard, Beckham and Joe Cole to do this creative thing.' Gerrard could be the continuity man as Graham Taylor calls it. Michael Carrick could do it. "The problem in England is that we pay superstar status to people like Gerrard, Lampard and Beckham. We have too many players of a certain stature in the team, who demand they do more than be continuity players. In Italy, when Gianfranco Zola and Diego Maradona were at Napoli, both were No 10s and you wouldn't play them together. In England we'd put them in together. We cannot have every superstar. "For me, Brazil's most important players are Ze Roberto and Emerson or Gilberto Silva, who allow the others to do what they do. They have to be respected, rather than us saying: 'Owen Hargreaves and Michael Carrick are not the important ones. The important ones are Beckham, Owen and Gerrard.' "Les Taylor was our continuity man at Watford. At Liverpool we had Ronnie Whelan. If Ronnie played one-on-one against Gerrard, with Gerrard's energy, strength, fitness and ability to hit 30 yards, he's not as good but it is about fitting people into a jigsaw. "Players have a responsibility to the team. We focus too much on our great individuals, and that empowers them to feel: 'I am the one to take the game by the scruff of the neck.' Now we expect Wayne Rooney when he is back to do something special. Rooney will give you something else, but how fit is he? Maybe if he comes in now it will get him match fit for the knock-out rounds, which will be hard games. It's a difficult decision. "Eriksson is a good coach, and England were in disarray when he came in. But to take the step beyond the quarter-finals, what philosophy does he have to change things tactically, with substitutions? That's where coaches really earn their money. That's where Sven has fallen down. To go that step further, you need an inspirational coach." Portugal's coach, Scolari, impresses Barnes. "Portugal play a slower tempo, which gives the whole team the opportunity to get up the field and they have three or four in the box when the cross comes in. With England, Gerrard or one of the midfielders gets the ball in front of the back four, hits the ball up to Peter Crouch 60 yards away and we can't get up to support him. "England have a problem when the ball is played up to Crouch because of these South American or continental defenders. The best player I have seen mark Crouch is Ricardo Carvalho for Chelsea. They are cute, get in front of you, nudge you, push you, and they go down when you push them. How many free-kicks did Crouch give away which weren't free-kicks? The referee is pressured to give them. When playing against small defenders who go down rather than show how strong they are, hitting the ball up to Crouch is not the answer. "England fans wouldn't stand for England keeping the ball for 30, 40 passes against Paraguay. But we were 1-0 up against Paraguay, and being overrun in midfield, so it was a good sub by Sven to bring on another midfielder. Those people talking about putting Theo Walcott on are ridiculous. Why go gung-ho? The charge of the Light Brigade is fine if you are 1-0 down and have to win it. Then put on Walcott. "Paraguay didn't hurt England but Brazil would have done with the same amount of possession. Brazil showed that last time against England with 10 men [winning the 2002 quarter-final]. And Brazil are better now. They now have Kaka, Robinho, and Ronaldinho is better than 2002." And, unlike England, Brazil boast an enduring DNA. The Telegraph

It's amazing how little (or none) long ball is played compared with England and how many passes are put together by the Argies. It's all pass and move, one touch stuff. England in both games have struggled to put 4 passes together

Unbelieveable presence and great footballer. Thanks for showing me what a great midfield player is all about Will be a huge void to fill.

Good to see such a healthy respect between the two on court. Both showing great sportsmanship and Nadal saying during the presentation ceremony that Fed is the greatest player in the history of tennis. He could have a say in that if he keeps stopping him from winning at RG

Nadal's won