Jump to content
I am no longer developing resources for Invision Community Suite ×
By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans.

jimmylibel

Sponsors
  • Posts

    6,995
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jimmylibel

  1. And yet the senior football reporter with Sport Bild reckons we’re in for him and that it’s between us, Bayern and a Spanish club. I’d say “start a process” could possibly mean begun negotiating with Leverkusen, rather than not having expressed a firm interest to his reps.
  2. I think there’s maybe more subtly to our transfer strategy than we sometimes appreciate. So the point about Werner being a notable omission in that piece is very fair. But there were other articles a week or two ago suggesting we weren’t interested ‘at this point’ but would continue to monitor his progress. I think some of the phrasing around our interest/ non interest in Sancho (and Havertz) has also been quite carefully worded. Some of this may come down to the negotiating dance. Sometimes we’re genuinely not interested. Sometimes we’re being used to flush out other clubs or a new contract. But just because a piece suggests we’re not interested that doesn’t always make it true. https://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/liverpool-pull-out-of-62m-deal-for-romas-alisson/1pj4k7124qu631rx4h0jo0p0xf
  3. Report in France suggesting Soumare from Lille turned down Newcastle as he’s waiting for us as his first choice and if not then the Mancs. Price approx £50m. That’s also the ballpark for Grealish’s supposed release clause.
  4. I still think we’re in for Sancho. May not get him but I think we’re at least part of the discussion. Or Dortmund.
  5. Stop hacking me
  6. 24 wins from 25 games. 22 points clear. Feck I’ve fallen asleep while cheating on Football Manager again haven’t I?
  7. Np. (Rusty beat me to it. That’ll teach me for posting without refreshing the thread!)
  8. I hear you, I was annoyed reading that too. But on the flip side I’d be happy for him to be given four years to see if he can live up to that comparison!
  9. Think there’s a fairly decent chance Lovren wants to leave this summer though. But Coady wouldn’t be the solution if he does.
  10. It seems like we may have briefed Sky that we’re ‘unlikely to pursue’ a summer move for Werner, ‘as things stand’. I presume this is to avoid discouraging another potential target - if the briefing did come from us.
  11. Paul Joyce saying we’ve told Roma and Sevilla Shaqiri won’t be leaving this window, but we’ll be looking for €30m if he goes in the summer.
  12. This content is not viewable to guests.
  13. That’s ‘Risdale era Leeds’-esque
  14. Wasn’t suggesting they were credible sources, just that it was being reported by some outlets that weren’t merely Twitter based WUMs. It seems to have stemmed from a report in Spain, which again is far from credible.
  15. FWIW a few reports from more mainstream media that we’re preparing a bid for Kai Havertz. Figure being suggested is £107m. His form this season wouldn’t support that size a bid, I suspect he may go for a little less circa €100m.
  16. He’s just looking for a rationale for switching allegiance. ‘They’re no longer our rivals so it’s ok to have them as my other team...’
  17. This content is not viewable to guests.
  18. This content is not viewable to guests.
  19. I don’t really buy into the whole ‘Liverpool won’t spend big on another attacker’ line that seems to be pushed by a few of the transfer focused commentators etc. We’re definitely scoping out the possibility of a deal for Sancho, we’re been strongly and regularly linked with Dembele from Barcelona over the last couple of years, same with Werner. Add in that we were apparently saving our pennies last summer so we could go for a big target this coming year and that we’re also apparently focused on signing ‘game changers’, you’d have to wonder if we’re not after an elite attacker then exactly who could we be after?
  20. This content is not viewable to guests.
  21. This content is not viewable to guests.
  22. City also rumoured to be interested in Ake
  23. This content is not viewable to guests.
  24. This content is not viewable to guests.
  25. Could have. I don’t know where it was first mooted. I think it was in an article on LFC News Now that I read it, but I can’t remember where that piece had sourced it from.
×
×
  • Create New...