Swipe Posted May 18, 2009 Posted May 18, 2009 http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/index.php/2009...gue-200910-kits Arsenal's away kit is a bit weird. And I really hope that's the new United kit!
fyds Posted May 18, 2009 Posted May 18, 2009 (edited) 'As is usually the case, Manchester Utd have had a raft of supposed designs leaked, with various sponsors splashed over the front. They all seem to agree there’ll be a V-shaped design somewhere on the shirt, though. Our favourite is the minimalist retro home shirt with collar, a mash-up of FA Cup Final strips worn from 1909 through to the early ‘70s.' ...except United weren't in any early 70' EA cup finals - or late 60's for that matter. Chelsea wore their new one the other day - looked like a Tour de France team that had forgotten their bikes. Edited May 18, 2009 by fyds
fyds Posted May 18, 2009 Posted May 18, 2009 Chelsea's is very odd looking indeedIn the words of my good lady wife 'What the f*ck are they wearing?' She thought it looked like a diving suit (appropriate for Drogba).
fyds Posted May 18, 2009 Posted May 18, 2009 Adidas kits are terrible.Ours isn't! Nike are worse (Barcelona aside)
Jarg Armani Posted May 18, 2009 Posted May 18, 2009 Ours isn't! Nike are worse (Barcelona aside) No way. Nike's kits are the best by miles, even Umbro have been better than Adidas this season. Fulham's and Villa's kits are better than ours, this should not be the case. All Adidas kits look the same. West Brom's kit is possibly the nicest of the season, but that's a lot to do with it being sponsorless.
Maharajkumar of Vizianagram Posted May 18, 2009 Posted May 18, 2009 Have WBA been holding out for more money all season? How'd they balance the books without a shirt sponsor?
Sir Tokyo Sexwale Posted May 18, 2009 Posted May 18, 2009 Adidas hands down. Nike is gash & always has been
baz2107 Posted May 18, 2009 Posted May 18, 2009 Have WBA been holding out for more money all season? How'd they balance the books without a shirt sponsor? was talking to a Baggies fan yesterday, apparently they wanted 1m a season from a new Sponsor as their old deal ran out with T Mobile, nobody came forward early on in the season, and apparently they've made more than the 1m in additional shirt sales because so many fans prefer the kit without a sponsor
Sir Tokyo Sexwale Posted May 18, 2009 Posted May 18, 2009 they've got those stupid stripes on it alredy - at the back. Yes it is. And the bird in the Killy strip isn't great
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now