Guest macca777 Posted January 24, 2008 Posted January 24, 2008 http://www.snopes.com/sports/soccer/barbados.asp A match played around Dec ‘93-Feb ‘94 between Barbados and Grenada in some cup competition. Barbados needed to win the game by two clear goals in order to progress to the next round. Now the trouble was caused by a daft rule in the competition which stated that in the event of a game going to penalty kicks, the winner would be awarded a 2-0 victory. With 5 minutes to go, Barbados were leading 2-1, and going out of the tournament. Then, when they realised they were probably not going to score against Grenada’s massed defence, they turned round, and deliberately scored an own goal, to level the scores. Grenada, themselves not being stupid, realised what was going on, and then attempted to score an own goal themselves. However, the Barbados players started defending their opponents goal to prevent this. In the last five minutes, therefore, spectators were treated to the incredible sight of a team defending their opponents goal against attackers desperately trying to score an own goal! Eventually, the game did go to penalties, which Barbados won… Apparently it was televised live.
ManxRed Posted January 24, 2008 Posted January 24, 2008 You'd think that defending an opponents goal against an own goal would be nigh on impossible, if you consider that they only have to get the ball to the keeper and he could run into his own goal carrying the ball and the job would be done.
stressederic Posted January 24, 2008 Posted January 24, 2008 Would it not have been smarter for Grenada to just mount a counter attack aganist Barbados' goal whilst all of their players were trying to prevent them from scoring an own goal?
Euphrates Posted January 24, 2008 Posted January 24, 2008 You'd think that defending an opponents goal against an own goal would be nigh on impossible, if you consider that they only have to get the ball to the keeper and he could run into his own goal carrying the ball and the job would be done.How do you get it to your keeper? Juggle it up and pass it to him with your knee?
ManxRed Posted January 24, 2008 Posted January 24, 2008 How do you get it to your keeper? Juggle it up and pass it to him with your knee? What were the rules in '93? I can't remember. He could pounce at the feet of any opposing player who receives the ball in the area, they'd be trying to dribble the ball back out!
RP Posted January 24, 2008 Posted January 24, 2008 How do you get it to your keeper? Juggle it up and pass it to him with your knee? That would be a back pass.
Euphrates Posted January 24, 2008 Posted January 24, 2008 (edited) That would be a back pass.Well then head it to him. That's allowed isn't it?] Edit From Fifa:An indirect free kick is awarded to the opposing team if a goalkeeper,inside his own penalty area, commits any of the following four offences:• takes more than six seconds while controlling the ball with hishands before releasing it from his possession• touches the ball again with his hands after it has been releasedfrom his possession and has not touched any other player• touches the ball with his hands after it has been deliberately kickedto him by a team-mate• touches the ball with his hands after he has received it directly froma throw-in taken by a team-mate Kicked, the knee isn't kicked. Edited January 24, 2008 by Euphrates
Euphrates Posted January 24, 2008 Posted January 24, 2008 What were the rules in '93? I can't remember. He could pounce at the feet of any opposing player who receives the ball in the area, they'd be trying to dribble the ball back out!back-pass rule came into effect in 92
Gerry Posted January 25, 2008 Posted January 25, 2008 Kicked, the knee isn't kicked. Wrong I'm afraid. Decision 3Subject to the terms of Law 12, a player may pass the ball to his owngoalkeeper using his head or chest or knee, etc. If, however, in theopinion of the referee, a player uses a deliberate trick while the ball isin play in order to circumvent the Law, the player is guilty of unsportingbehaviour. He is cautioned, shown the yellow card and an indirectfree kick is awarded to the opposing team from the place where theinfringement occurred. * (see page 3)A player using a deliberate trick to circumvent the Law while he istaking a free kick is cautioned for unsporting behaviour and shownthe yellow card. The free kick is retaken.In such circumstances, it is irrelevant whether the goalkeeper subsequentlytouches the ball with his hands or not. The offence is committedby the player in attempting to circumvent both the letter andthe spirit of Law 12.
jimmylibel Posted January 29, 2008 Posted January 29, 2008 Would it not have been smarter for Grenada to just mount a counter attack aganist Barbados' goal whilst all of their players were trying to prevent them from scoring an own goal? That's what I was thinking. No cutting edge that's their problem.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now