Jump to content
I will no longer be developing resources for Invision Community Suite ×
By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans.

US child protection laws

Bigal

By Bigal
in The Swanny

 Share

Recommended Posts

Bigal

Bigal

Posted
Posted

The US Supreme Court has refused to hear an appeal by a high school teacher from Arizona sentenced to 200 years in jail for possessing child pornography.

 

Morton Berger had claimed the sentence was so disproportionate to his crime it breached the constitution.

 

If the 52-year-old had been tried in a federal court or lived elsewhere he would have received a lighter sentence.

 

But he was living in Arizona when he was caught with thousands of images of child abuse on his computer.

 

Stark differences

 

The state has the nation's toughest laws on child abuse and exploitation.

 

Indeed, the prosecutor had asked for a 340-year sentence but the trial judge imposed the minimum of 10 years for each of 20 images - to be served consecutively for a total of 200 years without the possibility of probation, early release or pardon.

 

Mr Berger's lawyers asked the Supreme Court to hear an appeal.

 

They argued the sentence was wildly disproportionate - much longer than that for rape or even second degree murder and claimed it amounted to cruel and unusual punishment.

 

The state of Arizona argued each image of child abuse was a separate crime so the sentences had to run consecutively.

 

The Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal and gave no reason but the case has highlighted stark differences in sentencing policy across the US.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Home

Notifications

PMs
×
×
  • Create New...