Redray

Last sentence. "Hicks and Gillett may have to settle for as little as $700 million for the team or lose the team to the bank." Going by their conversion rate stated earlier in the articele (800 million pounds ($1.5 billion))

Forbes say value falling. Now circa £360 million. http://blogs.forbes.com/mikeozanian/2010/09/14/liverpools-value-falling-due-to-debt-woes/

Hoping he will not be fit to play us is one thing but rejoicing a footballers serious injury is out of order.

RBS take note. Reuters - http://fourfourtwo.com/news/italy/63176/default.aspx MILAN - The process to sell AS Roma has started after agreement between the controlling parties, UniCredit deputy chief executive Paolo Fiorentino said, sending shares in the Italian football club higher. Creditor bank UniCredit has been working with owner Italpetroli for months in an effort to put the club up for sale and wipe out large debts. "It went well, there has been a kick off," Fiorentino told reporters after a meeting on Monday with sale advisor Rothschild. He said the sale process had begun with the agreement of Italpetroli head and club president Rosella Sensi and that UniCredit, which has de facto control of the club, was interested in a good result rather than a speedy sale. Russian media reported on Tuesday that the vice president of oil company LUKOIL, Leonid Fedun, was interested in purchasing a controlling stake, but LUKOIL had no comment. Italian media have listed several other interested parties. Roma shares were up 10 percent at 1.210 euros at 12:09pm GMT. Roma, who finished second in the Italian league last season and were runners-up in the Italian Cup despite their financial constraints, have been the subject of continual takeover talk with Italpetroli struggling to deal with arrears. Creditors have been trying to force a sale for three years but bids from billionaire financier George Soros and a Swiss consortium never came to fruition.

He he. Looks like you missed out out on the drunken bhangra dance moves that get into full flow towards the end! It can get boring after a bit though believe me. Particularly as its wedding season just coming to an end. Literally a wedding every weekend.

Reina Kelly - Carra - Agger - Konchesky Lucas - Merieles Gerrard Johnson - Torres- Cole http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/blog/2010/aug/04/the-question-is-4-2-1-3-the-future

rorysmith_tel RT @paul_tomkins If you press higher up the pitch you force mistakes + get chances to 'break' far closer to opposition goal <--LFC now don't

Think the shots on goal by us comparison would be even more interesting.

Your point the other day about allowing any disaffected players to leave to in order to hang on him this is only bit of sense that has been on here for weeks. Utter shambolic treatment of an immense coach by the club.

Or that they have had enough of trying to resolve matters amicably and reasonably. Smacks of a*** covering in advance in the event of legal action.

Seems they've both been leaking stuff to the media. RBS and their comments that the loan is now a 'toxic asset', whatever that might be and apparent reports from Barclays such as this; http://football-talk.co.uk/7629/barcap-bidders-liverpool-fc/

He doesn't seem to mind balls being pumped into our box with the wide midfielders tucking in and letting it happen. He practically admitted this in the post match interview. The way we are defending just now means this is a recipe for diaster. If the Greek does not play next weekend then god help us.

Scary. http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2004/mar/07/sport.features1 Where once all the lines on all the graphs had been going up, now they were going down, with three glaring exceptions: total debt, debt payments due and wages. In plain terms, less and less money was coming in and more and more was going out. Dramatically, Leeds United had flipped out of a virtuous upward spiral of football success feeding financial success into a fast-moving downward vortex where losses and high wages fed debts, which in turn caused more losses and more debts. When the accounts became public that autumn one person who recognised this immediately was Bill Gerrard, an economist at Leeds Business School, a fan and an occasional consultant to the club. 'When I saw the figures I could hardly believe it,' he recalls now. 'I calculated then that they were going to need to find £40m to keep trading. In fact I was wrong: they needed £50m.' 'We had a plan B,' says one of the directors, who declines to be named. 'We had the ability to sell players. In the players on our books we had assets worth almost £200m and we could wipe out our debt at any time through judicious sales.'

Four games is enough for you to see how he is setting the side up. That system is not going to suddenly change twenty games or so in.

Pelligrini confirmed he was interviewed and was keen on the position but was not offered it.

Reina

Precisely why he appeared to fit in so well.

Which was worse?

Help me please, someone....anyone.

No 'going to' about it. We are. Reap....sow etc.

I meant me!

Maybe with benefit of hindsight but this was the only way to improve at that point.

Its completely different. Last year we had the players statement. They didn't want to play for Rafa anymore. What you are watching now is regression. Totally different.

A footballing philosophy based on not seeking to control the game and surrendering possession is not the Liverpool way. Dire times ahead.

Two defensive and no Gerrard in the middle. Not a squeak from Sky. Wait. Rafas gone of course. My mistake.