Redwire

B*llocks.

This ref is a c*nt.

ffs, the lad can't win. Momo's started alright.

A man has been arrested following an allegation of rape at a hotel where Manchester United players and other guests were attending a party. The alleged attack on a 26-year-old woman took place at the Great John Street Hotel in Manchester in the early hours of Tuesday. Hotel managers confirmed the venue was fully booked out for a private party. A 19-year-old man has been arrested and is due to be questioned by officers from Greater Manchester Police. A Manchester United spokeswoman declined to comment on the case, which saw officers called to the hotel at 0400 GMT. Detectives are refusing to confirm or deny the involvement of any players or club employees in the incident. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/7151136.stm

This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.

Dreadful defending from West Ham.

The Echo are interpreting Parry's statement as we are sticking with the new design. http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-f...00252-20254685/ LFC: Reds rubbish 'stadium scrapped' reports Dec 15 2007 LIVERPOOL FC today rubbished reports they had pulled the plug on plans for the new Anfield. Certain media outlets reported the club were set to scrap plans for their new £400m stadium because funding for it has been hit by the crackdown on worldwide credit markets. It was claimed the volatile financial situation was going to force American owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett into taking on a smaller loan and see them ditch the revised plans for a 70,000 seat arena in favour of the original 60,000-capacity project. The reports also stated the project would cost around £700m. But Reds chief executive Rick Parry has today moved to assure fans there is nothing in the reports and the Stanley Park scheme is still on-track. Parry told the club website: “'We remain absolutely committed to the building of a new stadium which will improve on the original design inherited by Tom Hicks and George Gillett when they came into the club. “It will have a capacity of around 70,000, be higher quality and have a substantially increased Kop which will form the centrepiece of the new plans. “Ever since the original designs were unveiled, we have been continuously revising and refining with the intention of delivering the best possible solution to our future needs. “The situation in the credit markets has not affected our design, programme, or implementation of building our new stadium. “The priority has always been to build a winning team on the pitch and everything else we do is geared towards that.” The ECHO exclusively revealed the proposed look for the new stadium back in July. It will be built next to a community partnership centre, club museum and shop, club offices and a conference and banquet centre. LFC also want to build a car park for 970 vehicles together with a hotel, commercial offices, retail outlets for food and drink, and housing on the existing Anfield site. The unique glass and steel dominated structure will ultimately be capable of housing almost 80,000 fans, hopefully before the first game is played in August 2010.

JRC said he wanted "informed and detailed technical analysis by people who know what they are talking about". That's what we aren't getting at the moment. You seemed to be suggesting that because football is a fluid game it doesn't lend itself to such analysis. I agree that during the game there is limited scope for such analysis but we're not getting even close to decent analysis after the game when that excuse no longer applies.

So you're saying that intelligent analysis on formations, tactics, individual skills and technique, man to man match ups, tactical switches and changes during the game, analysis of goals and incidents, strengths and weaknesses of players and teams, managers' abilities to react to changing circumstances wouldn't be in any way worthwhile or useful to the viewer?

Of course it does, just not during play.

Your point seems to be that the sh*te spouted by clueless idiots like Nicholas is somehow given worth by the fact that Sky is paying them. That is patently nonsense.

It's not a misconception. Their thoughts and opinions are usually those of clueless idiots. Why on earth would one have to have met Charlie Nicholas before being able form the opinion that the man is a know-nothing fool? He stands or falls as a pundit by his words and Nicholas has time after time proven his opinions on the game are worthless execpt for their comedy value.

It's amazing how week after week the vast majority of ex-pro pundits prove themselves to be bandwagon jumping clueless idiots every time they open their mouths.

I've just seen myself on the Kop celebrating Ince's goal.

Nemeth.

I stood next to him on Monday and he's about 5' 10" or 5' 11" I reckon.

He doesn't limit himself to calling ex-players c*nts. http://www.ynwa.tv/forum/index.php?showtop...t&p=1906776

This content is not viewable to guests.

What a goal!

Some cotton wool I think for the lip he bust on Riise's shoulder after he scored.

Should have been a red. Yes!

This content is not viewable to guests.

This content is not viewable to guests.

Well you and the majority are all wrong.