Well yeah, but I don't think it proves anything. Fact is Aquilani has had fitness troubles throughout his career. Towards the end of his time here he managed to stay fit enough for long enough that he looked like he might, possibly, be able to make a contribution. In the end he put in a couple of decent performances against fairly lightweight opposition, but I can't see where he was going to fit into the team as a regular starter, and that was the main reason given for why we let him go. At least with Lucas and Poulsen you've got cheaper players on lower wages who can do a job. Aquilani was an expensive signing who was costing us big wages and didn't look like commanding a regular place. Anyway, this argument's been done at length elsewhere, but as I said, we'll never know how things might have turned out under different circumstances.