fyds

Yes - sums it up nicely. He has to go and frankly should have never have been appointed in a million years (or the 35 he's so keen on telling us about).

This content is not viewable to guests.,This content is not viewable to guests.

Bringing N'gog on was fine - although no injury to Cole, he wouldn't have done it - just sat their scratching his stupid chin. Bringing Poulsen on with 4 minutes to go - stupid in a Baldrick stylee - replacing Meireles? What use does he think Poulsen is?

He's said much of this in answer to questions on twitter recently too.

Y'see, for me you can't dissassociate all the 'background noise' - the poor PC's the dearth of tactical nous, the lack of guts, the self aggrandisement and jsutification from the piss poor results - it's like bundled software - it all begets itself like a footballing moebius loop the one part into the other, into the next and round and round... From top to bottom, inside and out we now see him for what he really is, what he always was - sh*t. mediocre, non-threatening, Anglocentric, self-serving sh*t.

Exactly how I feel - no pity or any other kind of warmth left in me for the t***.

This is a new country and new sport to most of them - they'll just want to be sure they do it right, winners or not. They won't as yet see it as vehemently or as passionately as we do. It's not personal, etc... Exactly John - personally I agree - I'd have liked him gone before he even got here.

Get your board and ceo in place, get them all talking to people in their full capacity and job specs, say hello to the press etc. Due process, unhurried, considered, doesn't leave too much room for arguement when you cut him loose.

I would think that's what we're waiting for - due process, effectively.

As a descriptor, 'Tosser' seems to be only the mildest of jumping off points - Aldo's been saying rather strongly he should go as well now.

Oh, I hate those widiculous, wascally, websites!

'Well, Van der saar isn't getting any younger and Fergie knows a good keeper when he sees one and Weina would be great capture for them. It's hard to hang on to players when someone like United come calling' Admit it - you can hear it in his voice in your head without having to spoof it, can't you?

I can imagine when Roy is asleep at night, he sees himself riding down the via Appia on a golden chariot, enjoying a full Roman Triumph for his 35 years of mediocrity and the Recognition of UEFA of his talents with a flip chart, above his head, a slave holds a laurel wreath and whispers in his ear in a Madrid accent 'So, remember thou art mortal, no?' at which point he wakes up screaming...

That's a terrible thing to say...why not John Henry, dressed as the grim reaper with a sharpened scythe on Halloween?

He meant 'top four' as in 'top 16' which is just as good for him.

I wish he'd shut the f*ck up. 'we're not very good you know, but it's not my fault...'

To which the only sensible replay of course is 'be a fat headed delusional c*nt and s*** manager as always'* * Not unlike our own thesedays.

Is the only sane and reasonable answer.

There is a difference between using a model as a blue print (a pattern to work by) and a carbon copy - the carbon coopy would require Wenger as manager and all that entails, the same squad of players and the same struggle for dominance at the boardroom level.

I think Hodgson's remarks about Rijkard, silly widiculous wotten websites and 'my brilliant 35 year carrer' show humility is not in his make up at all. Feck me...what nob was that?

Apparently he's a BBC producer bod according to another poster in the Takeover thread. That first 70 minutes was so radically different to any other Roy tactic or team I've ever seen it has to at least be a possibility of player power (or finding some tactical notes in an office draw with possibilities, no?).

F*ck me. Roy's a 'nice man' clearly.

Stop watching it - you'd be surprised how quickly your blood pressure returns to normal.

At least they help create a quorum to make such a decision in the traditional manner.

Exactly so.