It's been doing my head in, this bare-faced assertion that if the ref had allowed the goal he then wouldn't have sent Lehmann off. This forum seems to be about the only place where the opposite view even gets an airing! I always thought the laws were pretty clear - if there's a foul the ref can allow advantage, then go back and administer the appropriate sanction for the foul. No-one would bat an eyelid if there was a bookable foul in midfield, advantage was played and the ref then went back with the yellow card. So surely in this case, there was a red card offence (something even Wenger, Henry and Lehmann appear to accept), therefore correct course of action would have been to allow advantage, award the goal, then send Lehmann off for the red card offence. As for your point Liverbobs, I'd argue that Lehmann was still deliberately denying Eto'o a goalscoring opportunity - hence the red card. The fact that the ball then broke free to another player and the goal was scored is beside the point. Doesn't alter the fact that Lehmann had to go. But as I said at the top, my main frustration is this parroting in the media that it should have been either a goal or a sending off. And no-one seems to be questioning that orthodoxy.