Jump to content
By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans.

September 11th 2001


adayinthelife

Recommended Posts

But the fact so many of us are dismissive of any concept of other organisations involvement in the disaster, is sad, because it's exactly the intended response. Convincing a population that they're being lied to by their government is almost impossible, they don't want to believe that. It's exactly the intention to make all talk of conspiracy look ridiculous, so that there isn't any debate whatsoever.

 

As for 9/11, the planes hit the towers. It's the other elements that imply a wider conspiracy, this has all been heard 100,000 times before but it's worth remembering:

 

The WTC7 Demolition: not hit by anything yet chosen to be demolished by explosives, yet officially collapsed due to a single "fire". That building contained a bunker for the Mayor...it was supposed to be bomb proof, it also contained lots of documents.

 

I don't buy the Pentagon impact because theres no footage of it and most of the eye witnesses said it was something smaller than a private jet, it wasn't about the "lack of aircraft shaped hole" in the side of the pentagon that was the problem, it was the lack of any kind of aircraft wreckage or damage to the lawns outside the building.

Snopes.com tried to debunk the video that was doing the rounds on this, but it still didn't convince. Until they show cctv footage of a plane passing by along that route I'm not buying it, it looks to have been a cruise missile.

The pentagon attack was perhaps carried out to justify the massive military action they already, openly, had planned anyway, or their Reichstag fire if you will.

 

And as for the 4th aircraft: "Let's roll" etc, come on.

That plane was reported to have been shot down, then that version dropped off the news within half an hour or so. I saw the report, then it was never seen again.

 

There are plenty of other suspicious events that happened around the attacks, mysterious absences from the WTC etc, but regardless, these 3 alone are the clearest pointers towards at least some kind of deception. That doesn't mean "it was all an inside job", just that there has been some kind of cover up. Remember that a frightening percentage thought that "Iraq" had attacked the WTC. We can do better than to dismiss any query of the government/network news version of what happened on that day, even if some of the conspiracies doing the rounds are seemingly preposterous.

Edited by Aeroflot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 782
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The only single, even slightly plausable "conspiracy theory" is that the 4th plane was shot down.

 

Oh, and there are pictures of aircraft wreckage on the Pentagon lawn. Ya know, bits of engine 'n stuff.

 

You can do amazing things with Photoshop :hmm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was no aircraft wreckage from the twin towers either, and I'm fairly sure a plane hit them??

 

The pentagan aircraft was travelling in the region of 400 miles an hour. Every part, and anything (or anyone) on board will probably have been atomised.

 

I'm sure nothing was actually 'atomised' but still.

 

The towers.... they flew into steel concrete and glass, and at an altitude. There were fragments of wreckage found anyway.

 

Almost everybody along the route the pentagon 'plane' took said it was small, smaller than a private jet. The theories that it was either a global hawk drone or a cruise missile shouldn't be so easily dismissed, why would we find it so hard to believe that they could pull that off, after 30 years of almost constant deception. It gave them carte blanche to start to implement their 'project for a new american century', Rumsfeld wants to leave behind a legacy of a permanent American empire, it's not even like he's pretending he wants anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure nothing was actually 'atomised' but still.

 

The towers.... they flew into steel concrete and glass, and at an altitude. There were fragments of wreckage found anyway.

 

Almost everybody along the route the pentagon 'plane' took said it was small, smaller than a private jet. The theories that it was either a global hawk drone or a cruise missile shouldn't be so easily dismissed, why would we find it so hard to believe that they could pull that off, after 30 years of almost constant deception. It gave them carte blanche to start to implement their 'project for a new american century', Rumsfeld wants to leave behind a legacy of a permanent American empire, it's not even like he's pretending he wants anything else.

 

This one time in school i really didn't this other kid so i cut lumps out of my afro and blamed him and he got suspended. That's all I'm sayin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Almost everybody along the route the pentagon 'plane' took said it was small, smaller than a private jet. The theories that it was either a global hawk drone or a cruise missile shouldn't be so easily dismissed, why would we find it so hard to believe that they could pull that off, after 30 years of almost constant deception. It gave them carte blanche to start to implement their 'project for a new american century', Rumsfeld wants to leave behind a legacy of a permanent American empire, it's not even like he's pretending he wants anything else.

 

Wouldn't that theory fail to account for the actual passenger airliner which passengers are known to have boarded and haven't been seen or heard from since?

 

Is it the theory that this plane crashed in the sea?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't that theory fail to account for the actual passenger airliner which passengers are known to have boarded and haven't been seen or heard from since?

 

Is it the theory that this plane crashed in the sea?

 

They're currently unwittingly staring in a reality TV show called Lost

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only single, even slightly plausable "conspiracy theory" is that the 4th plane was shot down.

 

Oh, and there are pictures of aircraft wreckage on the Pentagon lawn. Ya know, bits of engine 'n stuff.

 

On the day, the news showed live coverage outside the Pentagon not long after the supposed crash. There was absolutely nothing in sight that would suggest a plane had crashed, just an explosion.

 

If you watch the 1 hour long documentary available through Google Video it shows loads of news coverage that has rarely been seen since. Try to ignore the annoying presenter and it's quite interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Decent film that, I've seen and heard most of the information and ideas in it before, but it was put together well.

 

Fair play to you for watching it.

 

I wonder how many of the others ridiculing on this thread have even watched the video?

 

I assume nobody thinks the mysterious collapse of WTC building 7 at 5.30pm later that day was at all strange?

 

This despite the owner of the building Larry Silverstein who in an interview admitted telling the firefighters we decided to pull it(term used to descibe demolition).

 

So how could firefighters(not demolition experts)be able to pull down a 47 storey building in a few hours?

Edited by adayinthelife
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume nobody thinks the mysterious collapse of WTC building 7 at 5.30pm later that day was at all strange?

 

This despite the owner of the building Larry Silverstein who in an interview admitted telling the firefighters we decided to pull it(term used to descibe demolition).

 

So how could firefighters(not demolition experts)be able to pull down a 47 storey building in a few hours?

 

Given events earlier that day, the collapse doesn't actually sound that strange.

 

Firefighters would, to a degree, be demolition experts, surely.

 

It could be judged safer to pull a building down that leave it standing in a state where it could fall down anyway.

 

There may be holes/inconsistencies in the story, but what alternative explanation has been proposed that doesn't have at least as many dubious aspects?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest sniffer

I was in a casino in Nevada at the time and nearly everyone around me was watching the TV monitors thinking it was a movie. One woman actually came up to me and asked me if I knew the name of it as she didn't think she'd seen it before! I had to tell her it was a newscast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was in a casino in Nevada at the time and nearly everyone around me was watching the TV monitors thinking it was a movie. One woman actually came up to me and asked me if I knew the name of it as she didn't think she'd seen it before! I had to tell her it was a newscast.

 

Did she then shout 'Holy Sh it!' or 'Oh My Gaaaad!'?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Firefighters reguarly pull down a building if they think it's going to collapse.

 

As has been said before, if the Pentagon was hit by a missile, or whatever,then what happened to the aircraft, it's passengers and crew, that were supposed to have crashed into it. And I've seen probably every show on 9/11 and have heard plenty of witnesses who talk of the passenger aircraft hitting the Pentagon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...