Jump to content

Match timekeeping


Ripley
 Share

Recommended Posts

Clive Thomas was always a self-regarding idiot but one thing he got right was to blow for time while that corner kick was in the air that deprived Brazil of a goal in the World Cup.

 

90 minutes is 90 minutes. Not a second more or less. Laws of the game. It has always seemed to me that, regardless of how many decisions a referee can get wrong during a game, the one thing he can do is time 90 minutes correctly to the second. There is nothing about letting a passage of play continue, allowing time for a set piece etc.

 

Are we (should we be) really heading towards a system of a timekeeper, independent of the match referee? If it means next time the ball goes dead after time up, then fine, surely?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...