Jump to content
By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans. By fans, for fans.

Legal help anybody


Murphman

Recommended Posts

My son is the 'lead' tenant in his rented house, 4 students. The house has an old TV in the corner, they genuinely don't ever watch it and the landlord was supposed to remove it but didn't, you can guess what happened next?

 

They initially received a letter from TV licencing saying no further action would be taken and then today he received a summons, he's lost the letter so it's not looking good. The fear is he gets a criminal record, there are currently proposals backed by Chris Grayling that criminalisation for non payment of TV licences ceases and it becomes a civil matter.

 

He's studying law next year and is absolutely terrified this could affect an application. also. if the law is change does anybody know whether this is likely to be retrospective?

 

He's scared to death something so trivial could f*ck up his career, quite frankly I share his fears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 182
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/how-to-tell-us-you-dont-watch-tv-top12

 

There's usually something you can do between the summons and the court case actually happening i.e. getting in touch with tv licensing and paying for it, or trying to get them to find proof of the No Licence Needed Declaration.

 

I'm pretty certain we got a summons when we moved house and I didn't update my address, the mrs went mental but I just phoned them up and sorted it out.

 

The uni should have a free advice service, he should speak to them as well.

 

What proof do the licensing people have that there's a requirement for a TV license in that household? Has anyone official seen the TV? If not, surely he or the landlord can just remove the TV and then there's no case.

Owning a tv doesn't mean you have to have a license, as the link above shows.

Edited by cymrococh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Least amount of hassle: pay the bill

Slightly more hassle: pay the bill, tell the landlord to reimburse you as it's his fault

Lots more hassle: tell TV licensing that the property is owned by landlord and he's responsible for the bill. this will depend on there being a contract between murph's son and TV licensing. If he's paid invoices before for example this won't work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Least amount of hassle: pay the bill

Slightly more hassle: pay the bill, tell the landlord to reimburse you as it's his fault

Lots more hassle: tell TV licensing that the property is owned by landlord and he's responsible for the bill. this will depend on there being a contract between murph's son and TV licensing. If he's paid invoices before for example this won't work

The occupier is responsible, not the landlord.

 

A bit of googling reveals that even if it did go to court, there will be a tv licensing representative outside who will accept payment (+ court costs) before it actually goes before the court.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The occupier is responsible, not the landlord.

 

A bit of googling reveals that even if it did go to court, there will be a tv licensing representative outside who will accept payment (+ court costs) before it actually goes before the court.

 

Just got in and haven't had a chance to look at this properly (The reds are on in a minute) but THIS is logical and thus it makes me happy. Cheers Cymro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact they just had a TV in the house wouldn't make your son liable. Someone must have opened the door to a TV licence investigator and gave your sons name.

 

Yes, his idiot flat mate let the fella in, he asked who's name is on the tenancy agreement and that was that. I think he's in sh*t. The question is, will this have any impact on his career if he applies to a law practice. Also, if the amendment goes through parliament to make this a non criminal act (and I think it will) would this apply to those already 'nicked' under the old rules?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By far the easiest thing to do would be to phone up asap and pay whatever TV Licensing think they're owed.

Exactly

 

And no, Murph I doubt it would be retrospectively applied and yes it may affect his law applications.

 

Pay the money !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...